Talk:Objectivity

The former article on Objectivity was deleted on 5-Feb-10 by a vote of 5-0 in Votes for Deletion. (In addition, "Objectivism" used to incorrectly redirect to it.)

This article is a replacement article for the deleted one. All that is left from the original is about half of Section 1 and the sentence on oxymorons from Section 2. Spıke ¬  02:19 6-Feb-10 post-edited

On the save from VFD

Jolly Good Show! MrN9000 could not help but notice that you have been doing some spiffingly good deeds of late. As such, you have been awarded this rather nice boxy type thing by way of recognition. Congratulations.

How's that for whoring? Thank you for all your efforts at VFD and all the articles you have helped to fix up. You are becoming an excellent example to others of what VFD is meant to be all about. Anyway, obviously I did not really mean any of the previous statement. I'm actually just giving you this award because I want my personal awards to appear more prestigious by virtue of giving it to you. MrN 12:16, Feb 6

Ooh, for a moment, I thought you meant me whoring the replacement Objectivity in a VFD discussion that had been closed! At least I didn't reopen it. You're very welcome, and I'm pleased that someone noticed. Spıke ¬  14:02 6-Feb-10

Well, I was Objectively impressed with your VFD whoring skills... That's a new one on me, writing it so fast like that...  :) MrN 16:04, Feb 6

I can always crank out a good copy-edit of Romartus et al. I'm in less control of when the muse hits. However, this morning it did; see UnNews:Entire Toyota Board Commits Hara-Kiri. Spıke ¬  16:08 6-Feb-10

Well, I read it, but I guess that this one went over my head. I'm sure you know what you are doing with it... MrN 16:19, Feb 6

I appreciate the expression of trust--even when combined with stark evidence of my failure to connect with a reader. Fortunately, I don't seem to be able to find my own Samurai sword. Spıke ¬  17:29 6-Feb-10

Neutral POV?

This page seems biased. Shouldn't there be some sort of tag or warning on this page that it may not have a neutral, objective POV? – Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.151.226.26 (talk • contribs)

I don't think it could be clearer that the article plays it right down the middle. You either think you are at Wikipedia or have utterly no sense of humor. Spıke ¬ 15:36 4-Sep-12

My God

Pure Ideology *sniff*. – roza (talk ☭ ctbs ☭ log) 01:34, 14 April 2017 (UTC)