Talk:Five Nights at Freddy's
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to Five Nights at Freddy's.
| ||
|---|---|---|
|
Article policies
| |
Image[edit source]
I'd recommend replacing the Freddy image with wholesome fanart. JCWCSP (talk) 17:25, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
- can you do that I'm trying to make the article actually good Uran1um is tastY (talk) 22:26, 1 December 2025 (UTC)
Story section[edit source]
I need someone to make the story funnier because I did a poor job at that Uran1um is tastY (talk) 12:31, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
- I'll make it funnier since I'm part of the ICU Doctoral Program. Sovietβ (Ask for free votes) 12:51, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
Garvey[edit source]
JCWCSP, enough Garvey! Iβm Tired of seeing it! Uran1um is tastY (talk) 15:35, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
Fine JCWCSP (talk) 15:48, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
- @JCWCSP: why are you still adding about this 'Garvey', then? I'm not much of a FNAF fan, but I'm pretty sure the main villain doesn't have the word "Garvey" in their name. πππDaniPine3 (talk)πππ 16:09, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
Sorry! My changes weren't saving, so I copied the section to paste it back in later. I must have removed the 'Garvey's before I pasted the text in again. ( JCWCSP (talk) 16:18, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
- @JCWCSP: kay, you're forginen.
btw, I've been searching about this 'garvey' guy out of curiosity, and apparently it's from a really disturbing fangame made by a pedophile guy... yeah, maybe you should get a different fnaf thing to reference. πππDaniPine3 (talk)πππ 16:22, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
Some feedback[edit source]
The page has improved over the course of the edits it's received but I think my general criticism going forward still is to try adding more variety to the jokes because a lot of it feels like low-hanging fruit. There's an overabundance of jokes about Toy Chica being heavily sexualised by the fandom as well as jokes about characters being pedophiles. I also don't really get the continued referencing of Dormitabis; it's not nearly as relevant to FNaF as the article makes it out to be as it's just some shunned fangame with poorly-handled subject matter, but alas nowhere near as notable as anything in the Fazbear Fanverse Initiative. Because of that, it being continuously referenced feels like it's for shock value rather than an actual joke.
On a positive note, I'm glad that someone's doing a page for FNaF; it hasn't had one for a while. Some of the jokes I actually found quite funny too; something about the dry phrasing of Fredbear being 'super homophobic' got me.
So yeah, keep up the good work overall --DiscipleOfGeorge (talk) 19:05, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
- @DiscipleOfGeorge: I've been searching about this 'Dormitabis' things out of sheer curiosity and I also believe it has no reason to be on this article.If anything It could be added to a "fangame" section but there are definitely much more well-known FNAF fangames out there than this one. I'll be removing all mentions of this 'Dormitabis' thing from the article. πππDaniPine3 (talk)πππ 19:45, 2 December 2025 (UTC)
ICU[edit source]
Is this good enough for the ICU to be removed? If not, tell me what needs improving. Sovietβ (Ask for free votes) 01:17, 8 December 2025 (UTC)