Talk:Euroipods Crusade

As you have no doubt noticed by now, this article is a rip-off/repackaging of the Talk:Euroipods page. Feel free to edit it all you want. I made this article to answer the objections of those who complained that we shouldn't highlight a talk page to get featured on the front page.

I agree that we should not highlight a talk page of an article on the front page. Nor do i think that it's necessary to highlight an article about the talkpage of an article. But what about the talkpage of an article that was about the talk page of an article. Now that would be a good idea.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 05:34, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Sweet! Good idea!--Bradaphraser 05:33, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

I think it would be a better idea to make this article mostly a commentary on the occurrence, with only excerpts from the talk page. Then you can provide a link to the talk page for people to drudge through themselves. There is no reason to have two pages with the same content. KATIE!! 05:37, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

k--Bradaphraser 05:39, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

No, but just for a second, think how unbelievably epic this is. It's like fucking Narnia all over again...   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 05:40, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Ok, it's getting too late to make this good here in Texas. You guys can butcher edit it all you want. I'll attack it in the morning.--Bradaphraser 05:43, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Wait... it's like a massive metaphor about Jesus and lions? Holy shit. I need to reread this.. whoa... Jlove1982 06:35, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, the money represents Jesus, and getting your friends to complete offers represents evangelism. The iPod itself represents Mr. Tumnis. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 21:15, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Brilliant!--Bradaphraser 01:41, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Lol narnia was such a fucking waste of paper. god just like lard of the rings, wtf was that?   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 18:06, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Yea maybe I'll go after it later, i wanna watch the ball drop first.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 05:47, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Once again, I present it to the masses as-is. You have my blessing to destroy fix it. Every time I try to comment on it, it takes away from the beauty that is the flamewar.--Bradaphraser 19:01, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

OK, I've condensed it to make it more legible. Maybe this will make everyone happy.--Bradaphraser 00:15, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

grmmr nd spllng

I'm considering fixing up the various crimes against the English language found in the comments, but I'm not sure if that would be a good idea. It would make the page more legible, but it might go against the spirit of the thing. What do you other people think? <> Mandaliet 11:07, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

I would definitely fix anything that was actually written to comment on the article but i wouldn't fix anything that was a comment by a user. In other words, anything that has a signature behind it I would leave.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 18:05, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Agreed. Fix my commentary up all you want. Leave the crappy arguments in all their juicy glory.--Bradaphraser 18:13, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Hokay. |> Mandaliet 02:54, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

iPod ~ Narnia?

Tell us what you think. And in appreciation for you contributions...we'll give you a sucker. (and a roundhouse kick in the face from Chuck Norris)

• Beyond my original point, all I have to say is that you should pass the Chronic (what?) cles of Narnia. Jlove1982 00:58, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• lol i totally have that video on my iPod it is kickass   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 03:07, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• • I've just got my Creative MP3 player minus video, but I do have the video for that. All I can say is that you can call me Aaron Burr from the way I'm dropping Hamiltons... oh, and Mr. Pibb plus red vines equals crazy delicious. Jlove1982 06:10, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• SNACK ATTACK MOTHER FUCKA!!   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 06:15, 2 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Argument from the VFH page

• Against. I like wiki-in jokes, but this one is too much. It is actually funny, i like the never-ending argument over an arguement joke, but this will be funny just for really uncyclopedia-adicted people like us (i'm new but completely adicted allredy). I think the main page and its featured article should be for everyone.--Rataube 19:46, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

HAHA you used one D in addicted, and two L's in already. So your vote doesn't count.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 19:56, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Doesn't count? Says who? According to which rule? Where is it written? Or may I assume that you are just pushing me to argue so you can nominate this page too??--Rataube 20:04, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Wow you can be my new idea man. Whenever i need a completely absurd or horrible idea I'll come to you. In return I won't have chuck norris round-house kick you in the face...yet.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 20:19, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. But i'm not afraid of chuk norris, send him if u've got the guts. Nothing frightens me, except from alien invasions, mad robots, Lord Voldemort and angry wicked kittens. --Rataube 20:35, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Oh, you didn't know? Chuck Norris is an angry wicked kitten!   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 20:37, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Noooooo! Please have mercy, I swear I will provide any amount of horribly absurd ideas you need, and I will attend my English classes more often. --Rataube 20:46, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

OK...but from now on you will only speak in Flamingo.

  t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 20:56, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Pink flamingo or nuclear-waste green? --Rataube 21:08, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

• For, but only if the arguments here on VFH over this article get added to the end of it. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 21:11, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Comment There is no such thing as a green Flamingo...uh, der   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 21:41, 1 Jan 2006 (UTC)

I want to commend whoevery wrote this.

I just shit myself laughing. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 01:49, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Thanks :)--Bradaphraser 03:36, 4 Jan 2006 (UTC)

We need something added about my banning and the IRC convos.

I believe some IP added one once, but it was reverted for some reason, and that edit isn't even showing up in the edit history. So I can't just go re-add it. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 18:03, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Throughout the crusades, both Euroipods and Rome were often sacked by Vandals

Should this be mentioned in the article? --User:Nintendorulez 20:16, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Yes, it should, and you're more than welcome to work it in. Also, if you'd like to finish the narrative portion using the Talk (something I started and lost interest in), you're more than welcome to. After all, this IS written more or less from your perspective, in a twisted sort of way, so having you finish it would only make sense.--<<>> 20:23, 5 January 2007 (UTC)