Talk:Canadians: Difference between revisions

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Braydie
(From Pee Review)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
  +
{{talkheader}}
  +
 
This page was originally planned as a rewrite of [[Canadians]], but when it was done I thought it was off-topic enough that it ended up as [[Canada/Origin]]. Later I decided that my initial instinct was correct, so it's here now (the original [[Canadians]] text was VFD'd, as it was abysmal). [[User:Modusoperandi|Modusoperandi]] 05:22, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
 
This page was originally planned as a rewrite of [[Canadians]], but when it was done I thought it was off-topic enough that it ended up as [[Canada/Origin]]. Later I decided that my initial instinct was correct, so it's here now (the original [[Canadians]] text was VFD'd, as it was abysmal). [[User:Modusoperandi|Modusoperandi]] 05:22, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
   

Revision as of 23:51, 29 June 2007

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to Canadians.
This is also a forum for spreading libelous rumors about the article's subject.
This is not a forum for general discussion about what you did last night. We have the Village Dump for things like that.

Article policies

This page was originally planned as a rewrite of Canadians, but when it was done I thought it was off-topic enough that it ended up as Canada/Origin. Later I decided that my initial instinct was correct, so it's here now (the original Canadians text was VFD'd, as it was abysmal). Modusoperandi 05:22, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

From Pee Review

Every year, around Canada Day (Fête du Canada too. Both conveniently fall on July 1th, which is nice), I get all nationalistic and nom a Canadaish page on VFH. Last year, Canada, which I nom'd on July 3nd, because I'm both forgetful and my memory doesn't work so good. This year, Canadians, unless I forget again. Yes, it's mine, but it turned out nice, and I walk it and comb its fur every day. I do! Well, enough rambling. It's got history, less the names and places and dates. Hopefully it's Canadian without being too Canadian. Hoser for hosers of all nations, in other words. Opinions? --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 10:08, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Humour: 6 A couple of giggles, not hilarious, but funny enough to be worthwhile.
Concept: 6 Not much to say here. You pretty much wrote in a humorous way about Canadians
Prose and formatting: 8 Very readable
Images: 6 I like the map one, the others are OK.
Miscellaneous: 6.8 million trees to every man.
Final Score: 32.8 It's quite a nice article, slightly informative but that's not necessarily a bad thing. I'm amazed you haven't mentioned ice hockey, as that's the first thing most people think of when someone mentions Canadians.
Reviewer: --Kelpan 21:28, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Sorry I couldn't think of more useful comments, but would you like a user template?

US flag.gif
This user is not American
…and unabashedly proud of it.
(But they're not saying where they're from in case y'all come and bomb the hell out of it.)
(List of NonAmerican Uncyclopedians)
Slightly informative is what I was aiming for. Too informative would potentially fill it with dates and names (my favourite "bit" is still reducing the Plains of Abraham, a major turning point in Canadian history, to a single line). I didn't mention hockey because I, um, don't like hockey. /me hides under desk. And thanks for the template; I won't use it, as I try not to define myself by what I'm not, but thanks anyway (and I already have the Canadian template hidden away somewhere under my userpage). --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 16:12, 8 April 2007 (UTC)