Forum:Anti-benson is here

Forums: Index > BHOP > Anti-benson is here

Note: This topic has been unedited for 6568 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

anti-benson is here! anti-benson is far superior to you, but especially superior to benson! anti-benson does not type in all caps because that would caues anti-benson’s username to be untrue! one day benson will kill you all, so i shall smite him first! anti-benson just wanted everyone to know that he is here so that he can out-benson benson by being his polar opposite. --Anti-benson 01:46, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

also, someone nominate anti-benson for ugotm. he deserves it--Anti-benson 01:46, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

...... --Clorox MUN ONS (diskussion) ☃ 01:52, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

ha! you mock me because you think that i am a fool, but i don't care! you know that i am right, or maybe not--Anti-benson 01:54, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Shut up! --Can't be bothered signing in 02:18, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

no, you shut up!--Anti-benson 02:25, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Oh, come on, you could try a bit harder than thet.--The One and Only Czar Yah 02:34, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

You foul beast! Be gone with you! --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 04:01, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

quiet, you. i wish to speak with benson, and benson only.--Anti-benson 04:04, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Is your name Fawaz? ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 05:58, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Benson + Anti-Benson -> ??

If Benson runs into Anti-Benson, or vise versa, what will happen? Will they annihilate each other? I am looking forward to that day! -- Colonel Swordman 08:14, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

No. There will be a massive battle. See the Chronicles of Uncyclopedia, Unpocalypse (Or "Revelation"):

And when the thousand years are expired, Fawaz shall be loosed out of his prison,

And shall go out to deceive the nations which are in the four quarters of the earth, Wikipedia, and Encyclopædia Dramatica, to gather them together to battle: the number of whom is as the sand of the sea.

And they went up on the breadth of the Uncyclopedia, and compassed the camp of the admins about, and the beloved city: and fire came down from BENOSN out of heaven, and devoured them.

And the anti-banson that deceived them was cast into the lake of blocking and bannination, where the anti-benson and the false Bensons are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever.

And I saw a great white throne, and him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found no place for them.

And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before BENSON; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of Uncyclopedia: and the blocked were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works.

And the Ban Patrol gave up the blocked which were in it; and the IP block list delivered up the dead which were in it: and they were judged every user according to their edits.

And the block list was cast into the lake of pwnage. This is the second death.

And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of pwnage.

So you see, the BENSON will win. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 09:04, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

BENSON = Better than god, therefore anti-benson = totally weak. 'Nuff said. BENSON still rules all. - Sir Real Hamster {talk} {contribs} 14:47, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

This is what I found in Wickedpedia:

---

Properties of antiparticles

Quantum states of a particle and an antiparticle can be interchanged by applying the charge conjugation (C), parity (P), and time reversal (T). If |p,σ,n> denotes the quantum state of a particle (n) with momentum p, spin J whose component in the z-direction is σ, then one has

CPT |p,σ,n>  =  (-1)^J-σ |p,-σ,n^c>,

where n^c denotes the charge conjugate state, i.e., the antiparticle. This behaviour under CPT is the same as the statement that the particle and its antiparticle lie in the same irreducible representation of the Poincare group. Properties of antiparticles can be related to those of particles through this. If T is a good symmetry of the dynamics, then

T |p,σ,n>  α  |-p,-σ,n>

CP |p,σ,n>  α  |-p,σ,n^c>

C |p,σ,n>  α  |p,σ,n^c>,

where the proportionality sign indicates that there might be a phase on the right hand side. In other words, particle and antiparticle must have

• the same mass m
• the same spin state J
• opposite electric charges q and -q.

---

Thus:

• As a result of special relativity (i.e. E=mc^2), both Benson and anti-Benson shares the same rest energy.
• Since they share the same rest energy, they ought to emit the same amount of rubbish, assuming that rubbish is a form of energy.
• However, since they are both governed by Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle, they can in fact emit rubbish at random.
• All these, of course, are based on the assumption that they undergo pair annihilation/production in a continuous manner. And indeed, even if this assumption is ture (and it must be ture considering the amount of rubbish we have here), we still have to prove that rubbish is a form of energy.
• Who cares! We always assume rubbish is a form of energy, and in fact, that's what we use to power this stupid website!

-- Colonel Swordman 19:42, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

You are not Fawaz...therefore you are not the anti-Benson..just a loser who wants to cash in on Benson's greatness. Please fulfill the proficy of the loser:

"And there would be a wanta-be Benson who would come in the form of the anti-Benson. The 3rd test of faith. This time the evil would be stupid and boring, ready to be cast back to the ban logs from whench it came..." - Book of Benson pg.67

Benson 23:37, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

yeah!? well... eh, i'm bored now. good luck bensoning it up, benson.--Anti-benson 00:09, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Thank you, Anti-Benson. Benson 12:16, 20 June 2006 (UTC)