Forum:Suggestion of a stagant article variant.

Forums: Index > Village Dump > Suggestion of a stagant article variant.

Note: This topic has been unedited for 4388 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

THIS LOGO WANTS YOU!

Pokemon articles. Yes.

The main reason of the stagancy of this articles, is a fake biography is extremely difficult to make, and pokemon articles tend to be crappy, fake biographies. So instead of writing fake biographies we can write several conteversial/fandomloved pokemon and tell the people how they sucked. This is what encyclopedia dramatica does to pokemon articles. (But we are without the porn.) We can also write pokemon related sites, such as smogon which is for some horrid reason, completely unmentioned despite there is a lot of humor value about it. Any suggestions?

Also, Unprotect Pokemon. It's sysop protected while i can make it funnier.

--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 12:03, March 28, 2012 (UTC)

According to the thingy in the place, it's protection is "Block new and unregistered users". Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 21:25, March 28, 2012 (UTC)

What is Pokemon? Any relation to poker or happy families?? --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:00, March 29, 2012 (UTC)

Are you kidding? It's a once stagant article veriant. We used to delete a lot of them.--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 07:38, March 29, 2012 (UTC)

When did "stagant" become an English word? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:26, 29 March 2012

Since the Great Leter Shotage of 2004. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 03:36, March 30, 2012 (UTC)