Forum:BENSON'S BAN SHALL BE LIFTED TODAY!!!

FORUMS: INDEX > BENSON FORUM REBIRTH! > BENSON'S BAN SHALL BE LIFTED TODAY!!!

BENSON'S BAN IS TO BE LIFTED AT 21:36 ON THIS DAY. HE WILL RETURN WITH A VENGEANCE, AND ONCE AGAIN SHOW EVERYONE THAT HE IS BETTER THAN US ALL! ONCE THE CLOCK REACHES 21:36, WE SHALL INFORM BENSON ON WIKIPEDIA THAT HIS BAN IS OVER, AND ON THAT MOMENT, HE WILL ARRIVE BACK INTO UNCYCLOPEDIA, AND WE SHALL FOREVER BE GLAD! AND YES, IT SHALL BE AWESOME! --General Insineratehymn 18:39, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Is he bringin' his sockpuppets with him? They are the life of the party. 18:41, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Where's a Chronicles of BENSON when you need one? Ah well, *giddily anticipates the Third Coming* --User:Nintendorulez 18:48, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

The Chronicles of BENSON, Ch. X, Sec. II: "And the sun began to rise, for sooth! From the great quagmire of boredom that had begun to fill the House of Pancakes in the absence of BENSON, He who incinerates hymns summoned the strength to rise up and Sayeth: "BENSON WILL RETURN THIS DAY" (the Chronicler reserveth the right to paraphrase). 'Twas true, and the heathens would do well to heed this warning, for there is little time for them to repent before the Holy BENSON returneth to be Better Than Them. And yea, the Chronicler was so excited that he did change tense from past to present to past again, against the rules of grammar invented by puny Englishmen. And all did ignore The Beloved Commie Pinko's snide remarks about sockpuppets, for nobody liketh a party-pooper." In the name of the Holy BENSON, nuke.

--The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 20:15, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

Hate to burst you guys's bubbles, but it ain't January 9th yet. Take another look at the block log. —Sir Major Hinoa [TALK] [KUN] [20:26, 7 January 2007 (UTC)]

Eh, so I was two days off target. The fact of the matter is that Benson will return. --General Insineratehymn 20:35, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

And bring the sockpuppets. I love them guys. 20:38, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

No. He is not bringing sockpuppets with him. Quit asking that. --General Insineratehymn 23:51, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

HE WAS SUPPOSED TO BE UNBANNED TODAY! Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 03:14, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

I've got some socks sitting in my dresser drawer, so if anyone has some googly eyes I could glue those on and make puppets out of them. --User:Nintendorulez 20:37, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

• I hate to bust your bubble, but his block actually expires on the 10th:
  

08:56, 28 December 2006, Hinoa (Talk) blocked Benson (contribs) (expires 08:56, 10 January 2007) (Hope you enjoyed your Christmas present. Now it's time to serve the rest of your block. Sorry.) --AAA! (AAAA) 10:52, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Actually, you are wrong about that. It expires on the 9th.

21:56, 27 December 2006, Hinoa (Talk) blocked Benson (contribs) (expires 21:56, 9 January 2007) (Hope you enjoyed your Christmas present. Now it's time to serve the rest of your block. Sorry.) --General Insineratehymn 10:58, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Yeah. I live in Australia so I'm ahead by 11 hours. --AAA! (AAAA) 11:00, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

That's besides the point. Someone extended his ban for two more days than it should have been. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 14:00, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Meh. Anyway, his ban's lifted and is free to edit again. But where is he? --AAA! (AAAA) 13:08, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Where are you, BENSON? I'm cold and lonely... --User:Nintendorulez 20:16, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

I WAS ON IRC WHEN THIS HAPPENED! [1] CODEINE TRIED TO EXTEND BENSON'S BLOCK TO AGITATE US! TROLL! --User:Nintendorulez 20:25, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

I laughed. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 21:00, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

THAT FOOL! THEY'RE TRYING TO SCREW US! --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 21:11, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Benson's back, though I don't really care. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 03:20, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Wait just a tic.

You claim I blocked him for longer. WRONG! The total time of Bensons' block was 28 days; three less than Codeine originally intended (31 days, or one month). The fact of the matter is that Benson was unbanned for five days, from 23 Dec to 27 Dec. In all fairness, it should be expiring two days from now. And anyway, Benson's supposed to be a god, and aren't gods above being petty? —The Right Honourable Major Sir Hinoa KUN UmP UotM Bur MDA NS CM (talk) 03:33, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Confuse not the actions of BENSON with those of his followers. He is not petty; his followers just happen to be insufferable whiners. --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 07:14, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Hinoa, Hinoa, Hinoa, don't you know anything about the Greek Gods? They are the pettiest bunch of petty people that they make even the most petty mortal look generous. But maybe benson is above them? --KWild 10:31, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

The Greek gods polish BENSON's boots with their hair. That's only when BENSON is feeling generous. --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 17:17, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

BENSON IS NOT PETTY! BESON IS PRETTY! OR SO BENSON HAS BEEN TOLD... BENSON IS GLAD TO BE BACK AFTER HIS LONG BAN... NOW BENSON IS OFF TO DO SOMETHING INPORTAINT. Benson 20:57, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

WE CAN NEVER KNOW IF BENSON IS PRETTY, BECAUSE ATTEMPTING TO LOOK DIRECTLY AT LORD BENSON WOULD BLIND YOU. --User:Nintendorulez 22:36, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

WE'LL HAVE TO TAKE BENSON'S WORD FOR IT, AND THAT IS MANDATORY. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 01:02, 12 January 2007 (UTC)