Why? talk:Cancer is Great
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 |
Pee Review[edit source]
| link | score /50 | user | lowest score | 'date | comment |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Why?:Cancer is Great | 35 | M4M | Misc: 5 | 10/19 | VFH, anyone? |
| avg = 35 lowest = 5 | |||||
| Humour: | 8 | This was hilarious. I love how you exaggereted the facts |
| Concept: | 8 | The concept is a bit offensive, but Holocaust Tycoon was like that as well and it was featured, so there's nothing wrong with it. The POV of a Doctor is something I like |
| Prose and formatting: | 8 | I see nothing terribly wrong with the format |
| Images: | 6 | I love Image:Cancer-cola.jpg but it would be much better with a caption. A picture of a graph of deaths in Cancer would add value to the article |
| Miscellaneous: | 5 | I don't understand why there is a poll in the article, it doesn't add anything, could I be explained why there is a poll |
| Final Score: | 35 | VFH |
| Reviewer: | --Sir Manforman  19:05, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
| |
Suggestions for improvement, or Why I don't like it[edit source]
Well, like I said on my VFH vote, this page is ugly. Per Cajek's request, I'm here with a few suggestions:
- It breaks uncyclopedia.js. I don't know how, I don't know why, but all the little tabs at the top and the bar to the left are sized down by 1. I suspect an open <small> tag somewhere I can't be bothered to track down.
- All the images are on the right side Break it up a bit, for god sakes!
- List of bold and underlined items. It gets repititive. 1 list is okay. Two lists are two too many.
- It feels like a powerpoint. It really does. I know the title is Why?:, but it feels like an UnBook:.
- The poll - I HATE HAET HAT polls. Period. Almost as much as YouTube videos. They're not encyclopedic.
- The Why Box belongs at the top, not in the middle.
- The Nominated Article box is even in the wrong spot. It goes at the VERY bottom. below the poll(which shouldn't exist), even. Right above the Category tags.
EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 02:55, 25 October 2007 (UTC
- I agree with EugeneKay on that one. And also, polls do not add any value to the articles. I removed it, but if you have a problem, reply here (this page is on my watchlist) and we can discuss the poll further, but otherwise, very good article--Sir Manforman
22:42, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNO!
But thank you for the work you guys are doing. Smiles to M4M and Kip!!
-- • <-> 22:47, 25 October 2007 (UTC)