User talk:JBob

Thanks for the contributions! I've been reverting most of the changes made because people can't seem to keep the tone consistent, but yours fit in very well, and in the section I was trying to come up with ideas for. I still consider the article under construction, but I nominated it because that's probably the only way to ensure I'll finish it, haha. Anyways, also thanks for all the work you do around uncyc, you're on the recent changes a lot making everything a lot better. KATIE!! 09:54, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Thanks! I only did a small amount because I was afraid it might not be what you wanted, but since it was apparently alright, I'll see what I can do with, say, the "Rest of the World" section. -JBob 19:39, 3 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing-

Hey dude, thanks for fixing Cancer, my wiki-formatting is pretty bad (awful?) but I do my best. Let me know if you ever need anything, and nice to meet you.--2nd Lt. Claudius Prime 19:38, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

QFP

Quasi-featureds are for images that were almost featured, as in, they were kinda good. Not just any image that had the VFP tag on it. Please use a little bit more discretion when adding the QFP tag.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 21:24, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Works for me. The plan was to just get them all in one place and then sort, but I'll start going through them now. -JBob 21:25, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Thanks, I've been picking off a few here an there, but my judgement isn't the best... your turn.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 21:26, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Well I knocked off a lot. Ones that looked cut-and-pasted were thrown out almost immediately. Ones that looked done quickly in MS Paint likewise met the same fate. Anything that was just not funny in any way was thrown out after some thought. For images that were kind of borderline, I checked the articles they were linked to to see what caption they were given. If it complemented the picture, the QFP stayed; if it didn't make it any funnier, if was thrown out. I think that might work for some basic guidelines.. What do you think? -JBob 21:44, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Sounds good, have a cookie!   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 21:46, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Tompkins has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic.

Haha, thanks! I think I will! (after all this sorting) -JBob 21:47, 16 June 2006 (UTC)