User:The Thinker/PLS10

salamander[edit | edit source]

Humour:	9	It's completely refreshing to see this caliber of humor still being created around here. Bravo.
Concept:	7	The concept itself is kind of interchangeable, but the humor is consistent throughout the entire piece, serving as a really solid anchor.
Prose and formatting:	8	Very well written; I was impressed by the prose here. Honestly with such good writing I would've liked to see a tad bit more complexity.
Images:	8	The images are fitting and well captioned.
Miscellaneous:	8	Could've gone a bit farther with the formatting, but no problems here.
Final Score:	40	I really enjoyed this article. Great job!
Reviewer:	--THINKER 23:53, May 26, 2010 (UTC)

Humour:	6	A few good punchy parts, but overall it kind of just reads like a storybook tale.
Concept:	6	As a non-Christian there might be some disconnect as to the underlying funny of the article that is going over my head, but overall it's just okay to me.
Prose and formatting:	8	Well written. The storybook tale comment wasn't a negative remark: I think the writing flows very nicely.
Images:	6	Not overly funny, and kinda bunched together. You should think about making one of them a lead image.
Miscellaneous:	8	Good link-jokes, and it looks like some effort was put in, and I respect that completely.
Final Score:	34	Another very worthy submission and great addition for the site.
Reviewer:	--THINKER 23:53, May 26, 2010 (UTC)

Humour:	7	Some solid funny bits, couple lulls, but not so much as to bog the piece down completely (and due to the nature of it I'm sure that this could very well be intentional)
Concept:	8	I like the concept, and love that it arcs.
Prose and formatting:	8	Works well for the scope of the piece, and I like the formatting choices.
Images:	7	Since there are so many and play such a vital role in the piece, there could've been a bit more feng shui (ie. the middle section is comparatively bare in relation to the forest shots and final image). I still like how they're used though.
Miscellaneous:	6	Some good link-jokes, and the formatting is good like I said.. I just feel a bit more could've been done with it to really make it completely awesome.
Final Score:	36	So far three for three on enjoyable, well-made articles. Could it be four for four?! Let's find out!
Reviewer:	--THINKER 23:53, May 26, 2010 (UTC)

Humour:	6	Well written and has a few funny jokes, but honestly the article is more interesting than hilarious.
Concept:	7	Good choice I suppose. Could've been taken a bit farther.
Prose and formatting:	7	Well written and a fun spin on factual info.
Images:	6	Good enough, and decently funny, but could've been better.
Miscellaneous:	6	Kinda feels like you hit a road block at towards the end and didn't fully finish the piece.
Final Score:	32	Yes! four for four on worthy efforts! High fives for everyone!
Reviewer:	--THINKER 23:53, May 26, 2010 (UTC)