Uncyclopedia talk:Top 10 Articles of 2005
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Shouldn't that be:
- 1.
- 2.
- 3. (tie)
- 3. (tie)
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9. (tie) Redundancy ?
- 9. (tie) Redundancy ?
- Well, you'd need three 9s, since tomorrow will be Kitten Huffing. Anyway, I'm so fucking pissed that Euroipods made the list. Technically, it wasn't a featured article since the voting process was bypassed. If we had a way to perhaps pick five articles to vote against, Euroipods definately would've had a net score around 0. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 00:35, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
- Okay, sure. I removed the bottom section of this talk page from the history for obvious reasons. --—rc (t) 04:38, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
- Nintendorulez's metaphorical glasses have once again being stolen.
- All I did was make a prediction. What's wrong with that? So far, all of them have been right though (Redundancy was up when I made my prediction). ^_^ Three to go, and I'm feeling lucky. Do I win a prize? --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 21:38, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
- Holy fuck. I got all 10 correct. Someone restore that deleted edit, just so everyone can see that I'm awesome. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 18:29, 19 March 2006 (UTC)
- I was right again! Let's see how the next two go... --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 12:44, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
- All I did was make a prediction. What's wrong with that? So far, all of them have been right though (Redundancy was up when I made my prediction). ^_^ Three to go, and I'm feeling lucky. Do I win a prize? --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 21:38, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
- Nintendorulez's metaphorical glasses have once again being stolen.
- Okay, sure. I removed the bottom section of this talk page from the history for obvious reasons. --—rc (t) 04:38, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
- Well, you'd need three 9s, since tomorrow will be Kitten Huffing. Anyway, I'm so fucking pissed that Euroipods made the list. Technically, it wasn't a featured article since the voting process was bypassed. If we had a way to perhaps pick five articles to vote against, Euroipods definately would've had a net score around 0. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 00:35, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
What happened to number 4? ~ 15:50, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
- On a top 10 list there can only be 10 entries, but since two of them tied for 3rd place, and two others tied for 9th, 4 and 10 had to be left out. Just pretend that which ever is your favorite of the tie-ees is the real winner.--MrJimmy Journal talk 21:14, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
Someone flunked WikiML 101[edit source]
Whoever added List Of Weapons put underscores in the link for some reason. People, don't do that! It's unneeded, and looks ugly as hell! --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 12:44, 17 March 2006 (UTC)
Top 10 is a joke[edit source]
This is what happens when you let the people decide... damn democracy... -- ANONYMOUS USER
- Well someone woke up on the wrong side of the bed today... --ANONYMOUS TOMPKINS