Uncyclopedia talk:Pee Review/Pee Review Sojourn

I understand the usual demographic that I have to put up with here (and that includes you). You see, I picked this up at the bottom of the review queue and gave you comments that otherwise no one was going to give two bits to write. If you still don't realise how shaky a ground you have chosen to stand here in the broad scheme of things, then let me give you a few pointers:

1. The stuff you are attempting to write is not going to impress those who happen to have come across this website at all. It is a call from someone asking his own peers to pat themselves for a job well done and to laugh with his condescending trash-talk at the same time. I for one, however, am not impressed with what both you and Hyperbole are pulling off here, and you can kiss my butt on this.
2. You are not being helpful here at all for doing this. There are always some people who just don't understand what kind of poor taste they have for humour, but that's alright - just reason with with them the kindest manner you can manage and let them find their own way to develop themselves or move on with their lives (although I must admit I am very blunt at times in that regard). We have standards to uphold here but at the same time we need to acknowledge that people have differences. Doing immature, ironic hipster crap like this is not going help this website at all. It is just going to make it look as though it was run by a bunch of asinine dillholes with no life, and you are gaining no one's favour here except that from your own stupid Internet friends.
3. You are flooding the main space with nonsense. I understand there is always a lack of room for people to vent their frustrations in relation to all the fantastic work they are trying to achieve here, but does that mean we should now all go nuts and throw mud at everyone wherever we feel like to? The main space is the last place you want to express your own brand of wiki politics as this will achieve nothing except showing causal observers that we just don't know where the proper place is for everything (just imagine Wikipedia having an entire article based on some of the arguments they have over there - that would not be pretty). If you have anything to share with your own little circle of peers, could you please at least keep it in your user space for crying out loud?

Thanks for helping this website dig itself into a deeper hole. --The Colonel (talk) 02:21, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Wow Colonel, you're like Famine without the Sysop powers. Saberwolf116 03:50, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Just as an FYI: We're here to have fun. Sure, we may look like a bunch of idiots to everyone who stumbles upon our site, but since when have we cared? We're enjoying ourselves. Saberwolf116 03:53, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Before we turn this into another needless drama, just picture me making a circle with one hand and rapidly moving it upwards and downwards. Thanks for watching! -- The Colonel (talk) 05:57, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

All due respect Colonel. Look, don't get me wrong, I completely understand your opinion. The fact is, I was looking for ways to improve this and make it funny. Obviously, you don't like how I have combined two in-jokey things and put it into mainspace. If you would have said something like "If you want to explain the context of this Pee Review and perhaps overall Uncyclopedian humour, using the sojourn formula is just taking it too far. Get rid of the standardized formula and make it understandable to casual readers." then at least I would have had some advice. However, you never even came close to saying something like that. You kept on saying stuff like "every byte of storage space that it is now occupying has practically gone to waste, and every joule of energy that the respective hard disk drives have used to skim through its binary content has been meaninglessly converted to carbon emissions" and hence my reaction. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:25, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Socky: you have written a sojourn article. It fits the formula. You have succeeded. There is no 'advice' that can be given. Putting a sojourn article on Pee Review practically begs for a derisive response a la The Colonel. IronLung 07:47, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Yes, but I'm not necessarily aiming for a typical sojourn article. I want to expand on the formula so casual readers will get the joke as well. So I'm hoping to get some concrete suggestions around here. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:29, 6 June 2009 (UTC)