Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Why?:Use a wooden condom
Why?:Use a wooden condom[edit source]
My aristocrats entry, which pulled second place. Any suggestions to make it any better? Leave it how it is? I'm probably going to toss it up on VFH in a few days. - UnIdiot | 
| Talk | Contribs - 04:07, Dec 22
| Why?:Use a wooden condom is being reviewed by Your Source for Fine Scented Pee And Whatever Else Comes Out Of Him |
Yeah, I'll take a look at your wooden condom. • <-> (Dec 22 / 14:03)
| Humour: | 6.5 | avg of each section
You introduced the topic well. I now know what you're talking about! And I think that it's gonna be "hard" to make this joke work, simply because it's just one "big" condom joke.
Condom jokes. "Neat", I guess. How would I improve an article on condoms? Uh, the jokes will write themselves, I guess.
You say his name is Woody? Isn't that similar to the name used for erect penises?
Well, you took condoms "in a new direction" (???).
Mostly this section is just "short" and "predictable".
lol, GROSS!
mmhmmm...
Okay, we get it already, Unidiot. I'm probably going to suggest getting rid of, like, half of these sections just because it doesn't add anything... in fact, I think it may subtract from the overall value of this article!
I would've "scored" "higher" "butt" you let the joke get away from you too early. "PREMATURE" joke-ulation.
Okay, that's fine.
Again, I'm gonna have to go with "meh" on this one. Wait, even "meh" is a "sexual innuendo" now? |
| Concept: | 5 | Nope, I'm gonna have to say that the concept itself is predictable and lame. Gawd I'm tired of wholesome, Christian sex jokes! Look, I'll be honest. Why don't you just go "all the way" with this tired-"worn out" penis joke? Make it more sick and gross! Just go all out! Why didn't you talk about splinters? I noticed you were about to talk about necrophilia in Defend Yourself: When I'm out on the prowl in the graveyard, I don't want those extra sex diseases! I liked the idea of sharing it! Why not use it as a glove? As a hat? As a "fuckin'" nose protector, I don't care! This is far too tame and/or lame for my tastes! |
| Prose and formatting: | 7 | You need the proofreading service, but I'm not gonna "ding" you (?). |
| Images: | 9 | Nice pictures, sir. Very ha-ha. |
| Miscellaneous: | 6.9 | {{Pee|6.5|5|7|9}}
|
| Final Score: | 34.4 | I would get rid of any section that scores below a 7. You don't need them. Then I would go back and add lots of other crazy sections in there. Why are you holding this article back? In my opinion, it's got a ways to go before VFH, but hey, I don't make the rules. If anyone nominates an article I've reviewed that's above, say, 30, I'll vote for it. Also, this is December, and, as you may have been able to tell, anything with 10 votes gets featured, so any decent article will probably get featured. But why risk it? Why not spend a few days touching it... up? I hope I helped, Unidiot! |
| Reviewer: | • <-> (Dec 22 / 14:28) | |
You know, I meant to put in a section about splinters. I think it just slipped my mind. I agree with most of this, and the proofreading service is going to check it for me. - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 17:55, Dec 22