Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:Lyrithya/Fuck ChiefjusticeDS

Main

Current

Reviewed

Archive

Guidelines

FAQ

Committee

RotM

Fuck ChiefjusticeDS

Not exactly my proudest moment, but this... er... eh. This was actually rather fun.

Anyhow, flamingo said he'd review it, although if he doesn't in the next week or two, I'd welcome input from anyone willing to take the review more seriously than the article. If that makes any sense. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101110 - 20:10 (UTC)

Humour:	8	This is funny shit! This article seems to be a sort of spoof of the "vanity articles" that have long been banned from this site. You're the n00b user who's so damn pissed with User:ChiefjusticeDS for doing his job, and teaching people like you how to behave, you wrote these hilarious rants against him. The seemingly random references to cabbages and gayness, and the allegations of him killing your hamster were really the icing on the cake. Well done.
Concept:	8	Nice concept, though it was a little hard to grasp at first. You did a nice job with parodying the nature of vanity articles, and your rebellious rhetoric statements later on were a delight to read. All that rambling about User:ChiefjusticeDS's gayness, the description of cabbage, and the story of your hamster came together really well.
Prose and formatting:	9	You did a pretty good job with the formatting, arranging the article according to what grounds you were going to abuse User:ChiefjusticeDS on. There's not much more to say here, except that I really like your style.
Images:	7	The images could have been done a little bit better. Though there was a really funny link which showed me a huge cabbage, the pictures on the article itself are insufficient, according to me. Though whatever pictures there are, manage to serve their purpose.
Miscellaneous:	8	Now, it's time to answer some questions, young lady. How DARE you and User:Hyperbole revert my edits to Dragon Worrier just because it's a featured article! How DARE you remove my contribution to Gay because it "doesn't fit the article, love.". How dare you commit the very crimes you accuse User:ChiefjusticeDS of committing! Oh wait. You're not actually a n00b user, are you? You're one of the administrators! Well, guess what? I beat flamingo to the punch! That's right, I reviewed your article, and he didn't! How do you like that, bitch? As yet another obnoxious loser like you once said "Face it, genius. You've been played." (Harry Flynn, Uncharted 2).
Final Score:	40	Sorry about the rants back there, but I really couldn't resist this opportunity to go all "fuck the admins" on you. This is a heck of a good article. Maybe not good enough to become a proper Uncyclopedia article, as it is essentially vanity, but it is a really funny read, and a job well done. Good work! (PS- I really hope you're not offended that a n00b like me reviewed this before "flamingo", or whoever that is. If yes, feel free to delete this.)
Reviewer:	Scofield 16:23, November 11, 2010 (UTC)