Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnScripts:Unromantic Comedy
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Hi! Not sure if this is any good or just another pile of rubbish. Thanks in advance, Nameable ((talk?)) 20:47, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
UnScripts:Unromantic Comedy[edit source]
Nameable ((talk?)) 20:47, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
Let down your hopes, eh? |
Humour: | 8.5 | We'll break it down into section by section review.
So, overall, excellent job. Very funny, very few things for me to point out. |
Concept: | 8 | You had a very good idea here. THe title is fantastic. And you fdid a good job of executing that idea. I have little complaints. The one big, as I tried to emphasize a lot in the huour section, is get rid of the fat friend. She was unfunny, unecessary, and overall she subtrated from the script's quality as opposed to adding to it. That said, however, let's go to the bright points. The idea behind it all, where they made a bet to see if the guy could sleep with ehr is excellent. Also, smaller concepts found within the story are good as well, especially the part where they go to the cinese restaurant despite the lady hating chinese. That was awesome. Also, having the kid be payed "sweeties" to pretend Sam was his dad was great as well. The best, though, would e the guy coming back for round 2. Excellence! Like I said before, I have very little to criticize concept-wise. |
Prose and formatting: | 9 | I have no complaints. You did a good job with the labeling of who is talking. Also, you did a good job describing the actions people were doing before and after talking, and it was well organized with the Italics as opposed to standard font. Also, it was a nice touch how you did the actions within the actual quotes. The sections were decent length, except for five and seven, but they didn't really need it. I noticed one, maybe two (I can't seem to remember) spealing nitakes. However, I changed my mind, I do have one complaint. This is that you don't have enough links, there is two in the whole script. If you go through and add some more links, it will make it look better. Also, add THE END, or some sort of closing to the end. |
Images: | 6.5 | The images were probably the worst part of the article. On the first one, you did an absolute excellent job on the image... except for the part with the uncyclopedia logo down at the bottom. Also, the red lines connecting it to the heart look totally MS painted and it ruins the image. If you delete that, or ake the red lines look as good as the rest of the image, you're in for a winner of an image there. Also, the second image I don't think deserves to be in the article. You mentioned KFC once, and it was n;t that important, so I don't think it deserves an image. You should replace that one with, mabe a chinese restaurant. Also, perhaps you should add another image towards the end, because it starts to get dull down there. If you do that, it'll be great. |
Miscellaneous: | 8 | See Below. |
Final Score: | 40 | As I always do, I'll give you the condensed version of my pee. Good job, and here is the list of things you have to do:
SO, you got lucky, you only have two things you need to fix up, and both of them are really small. Great job with the article, and good luck! I'm done now! (mutters) Thank god |
Reviewer: | Staircase CUNt 18:14, 30 May 2009 (UTC) |