Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Sausage Festival
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Sausage Festival[edit source]
~Formerly Annoying Crap 04:29, 1 June 2009 04:29, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
Let down your hopes, eh? |
Humour: | 5.5 | We'll do the section by secton review for this article.
Overall, you end this article very, very, abruptly. I'm not going to put a section for FAQ due to it's length. You need something to close off your article. The humour is there, just expand and close it off. |
Concept: | 6.5 | You have a good idea here. You have a good idea for the history and why it was made. A couple of drunk guys were talking about sausage and decided they needed to sponser a school, so they made this festival. That is creative,but like I said above the eecution was lacking. You had laughs, but the ideas were all bunched together. You need to separate them and then, most importantly, expand on the main points. If you do this, your article won't be "incomplete" any more. Also, your ending is very abrupt, I suggest you come up with some sort of ending, such as a conclusion of ending of the fests. Also, a big error I noticed was the fact that in the Overview section you said that the sausage festival's aim was to pay respect to sausages, but then you said it was to raise money for a school. You're going to have to go with only one of these concepts, and I suggest the one where they pay respect. For its creation you could have the druk men say how they love sausage and how no one any pays any attention or respect to it, so they created the saausage fest to do so.
Over all, you have a couple minor and a major concept problem(s). You need to fix these up, and if you do so your article will be fantastic. |
Prose and formatting: | 7 | I noticed very few problems when it came to spelling and grammar, so I appluad you for that. Howver, there were several other problems. The problem that caught my attention the mos twas the fact that you had too many images. You have to get rid of at least three of those to make the article look balanced. I will further explain this in the image section. Also, the list you made made my eyes sore. It's ok if you hae a few items on the list with decent sized paragrahs next to them (See above), but if you have to many things with on line of support, it just gets hard to look at. That is why I recommend making the list into paragraph form, not only will it make it easier to look at, but it will also make it easier read through smoothly. Also, you should probably remove the FAQ section alltogether because of how short it is You will have to do that, or add content. I suggest that you remove it copletely, because an FAQ is sort of uneceaassary for an article. |
Images: | 4 | Whoa there! The images need to be fixed immediately! Let's count how many you have... one... two... three.... four.... what comes after four? Oh, ya! Five... and six. THat is a lot of images, even for a long article. You must remove some as soon as you can. I suggest the bottom three on the right, they are lame and do not contribute very well. Then, you must space out the pictures you have left over. It is very important that you do this. I suggest you make it the first thing you do when you start working on this article. Once you get rid of three or four, you should be fine. The three images you would have left over if you yeild to my suggestion, actually, command, are decent, not much more than that. They get the job done, but don't supply an real laughs or smirks. You could add funny captions to them, because funny articles may not be good without funny pictures to go with them. |
Miscellaneous: | 5.8 | See Below. |
Final Score: | 28.8 | Here are the main things you have to do with your article to get if to , what I expect, is VFH standards:
Just fix these four problems, and you'll have a good article. Good luck with it! |
Reviewer: | Staircase CUNt 18:28, 1 June 2009 (UTC) |