Dig a little hole, plant a little seed, grow a little tree, smoke your god damn weed
I made a rewrite of this article after noticing a particularly ignorant handout from the hi-skool my momma teaches at, or next to... I forget how exactly it's classified, but I digress. This is written in the style of someone who wants to keep people from doing marijuana, but who have little accurate knowledge of just how dangerous it is. Toodle pip, cheerio. Ж Cake-eating Cave Monkey or was it a giant monster or a robot?
| Humour:
|
6
|
I chuckled a bit but nothing outrageously funny.
|
| Concept:
|
3
|
Come on weed like we didn't see that coming.
|
| Prose and formatting:
|
5
|
Submit this to proofreading
|
| Images:
|
8
|
The strongest part of your article, very well done especially the graph.
|
| Miscellaneous:
|
5
|
The guy buried under the bags of weed is funny.
|
| Final Score:
|
27
|
This article isn't an original topic so maybe I'm being too ahrd on it. But it's plagued with obvious jokes and such, you need to rewrite this again and take a slightly different angle in some aprts and get it proofread.
|
| Reviewer:
|
Dr. Fenwick timestamp unknown or I'm too lazy to go find it
|
| Humour:
|
6
|
Whilst there are quite a few good tits of satire in there, the majority is swamped by a piece that fails to gain momentum quickly enough.
|
| Concept:
|
7
|
I understand the concept, and like it.
|
| Prose and formatting:
|
6
|
Don't deny it - it's clunky. For starters, those large, chunky templates at the top are hardly the height of wikitextual elegance. It's hard to look at without shuddering. Yet, it is well structured and the text flows.
|
| Images:
|
8
|
A good few, witty images come damn handy. Good work. Consider scaling down that bottom image.
|
| Miscellaneous:
|
9
|
Good SPG, no red links.
|
| Final Score:
|
36
|
An article that undoubtedly has featureable potential, which is more than I can say for some articles I've reviewed. It needs more, however, of the good stuff, and a nice smoothening of the edges, please - at least a quarter of its page length is down to that humongous image at the bottom. Tweak it so it looks nicer. Re-read your gags, make them better, expand and improve your article. Otherwise, I look forward to seeing the next edition of this article.
|
| Reviewer:
|
--The Rt. Hon. BarryC  MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 00:25, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
|
MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 00:25, 25 July 2007 (UTC)