Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Kentuckistan
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Kentuckistan[edit source]
I'll take this one. -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 03:08, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
- Good review, Razorflame! Watch out when averaging. More than 4 numbers and that Pee template breaks. Look at the code:
{{#expr:(x+x+x+x+x)/5 round1}}
(I fixed your scoring for you) Again, good job!! • <-> 03:58, Nov 15
- Good review, Razorflame! Watch out when averaging. More than 4 numbers and that Pee template breaks. Look at the code:
Humour: | 8.2 | *General(9)-Had me laughing a bit, but still felt a little dry. Maybe add some more humour?
|
Concept: | 10 | For the most part, this is a fabulous concept, and I believe that you took it to it's fullest. Good job! |
Prose and formatting: | 8 | Red links are in the article, a few sections that are too short to be of any help in this article, and a little bit of grammar mistakes that I could see. Otherwise, you did good. |
Images: | 8 | Images are prolific in this article, but humourous captions are not. Maybe add some humour to some of the later images? |
Miscellaneous: | 8.6 | Average of the other scores. |
Final Score: | 42.8 | Very nice article! Just follow the above and you will make this article fantastic! Keep it up! |
Reviewer: | -Razorflame (contributions) Talk 03:20, 15 November 2007 (UTC) |