Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Jethro Tull

Main

Current

Reviewed

Archive

Guidelines

FAQ

Committee

RotM

Jethro Tull

Sometimes I wonder why I put articles up to be reviewed, since it ain't never gonna happen. Still, get a load of this. Murder Frog (Argue loudly) Ride the snake...to the lake... 06:31, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Humour:	8.5	Amazing. Need I tell you which bits are funny? You probably know. There's inyourface jokes, and wanton randomness, which I like and am used to at Uncyclopedia. Only criticism, repetitive humour about Anderson's flute. Apart from that, neat. See: Early history.
Concept:	7.8	Interesting. I liked that jab on the agriculturalist and Metallica.
Prose and formatting:	5	Try and make a few short paragraphs rather than chunks. And there are some long sentences. Overall, not impressive formatting. See: Early history, Years of plenty.
Images:	8.7	Excellent. You know your stuff. Once again, an appreciated degree of randomness now and then. Well placed, too. I like the way you managed to put up a good image in almost every section. Suggestion: Place a photoshopped album cover under Discography. With a funny caption (duh).
Miscellaneous:	8	To fix: Sections 1, 2.1, 2.3. Large, breakable paragraphs in the first two. As for the third one, I can't exactly pinpoint why it isn't as good as the rest of the article. Then again, I can't make it better myself. Shame on me.
Final Score:	38	You might want to shorten the article a little bit, maybe chop those large paragraphs. Difficult, selectively letting go of funny shit. Imagine you have four kids and you must let one go, that should help. Anyway, great article. Enjoyed reading and reviewing. Could do with shit as funny around here a bit more often.
Reviewer:	Congrats, your piss got reviewed. Finally. -Tumb13weed (talk) 21:14, 1 June 2013 (UTC) If you found this review remotely helpful, please leave this pretty thing on my user page. Thanks.