Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/GLaDOS (resubmit)
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
GLaDOS (resubmit)[edit source]
Yes, I know, this has already been submitted, but I'd like a second opinion -- specifically constructive criticism from people who have not played Portal (game). 68.54.135.152 00:43, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
Humour: | 1 | Well, obviously this is a challenging one to review. As made clear by the last Pee review and by the VFH outcome, there are two kinds of responses to this article: people who get it think it's hilarious, and people who don't get it just look confused and click "back." Well, there's nothing wrong with an article like that; electrons are cheap, and something that's hilarious to only ten people still deserves to stick around. So, here's my own reaction, as someone who's played Portal for five minutes at a GameCrazy, and managed to die ninety times.
Nope. I truly did not understand anything I just read. |
Concept: | 10 | The concept looks great: from what I can tell, something is being satirized very cleverly. I just don't know what, or how. |
Prose and formatting: | 10 | I can tell these sentences are very carefully structured to get the most bang for the buck possible. I just don't know what the buck is, or how it's being banged. The interplay between GLaDOS and the article itself is also very clever, even though I don't understand it. |
Images: | 7 | Maybe they're good? I don't understand why they're funny. They are kind of small, and placed in odd spots. And there are sections with a lot of unbroken text; a third picture might be in order. |
Miscellaneous: | 7 | Averaged? |
Final Score: | 35 | Well, you wanted constructive criticism from a non-Portal player. I don't know how constructive this is, but: if you want this to reach a wider audience, make it understandable. But, you know what? I don't think I'd want it to reach a wider audience, if I were you. I think maybe we just have to accept that this is not a subject on which an article will ever be featured; I suspect that it's as good as it will ever be. So... congratulations on writing something that is apparently hilarious to those who get the joke; sadly, I'm not one of them. |
Reviewer: | Hyperbole 03:32, 3 July 2008 (UTC) |