Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Catsodomizerz (quick)
Catsodomizerz
A catsodomizer is a rare creature with approxiamately 5 legs; 4 where legs normally are, and wait for it: the last one is really an OVERGROWN seacuCUMber which many confuse to be its penis. Actually, the seacuCUMber really is its wank which just about throws everyone other than lieutenant unobvious (the infamous cousin of captain understatement) off, simply because he still thinks it is an extension of his own head.
Sometimes Catsodomizers go completely nuts. This state of mind can easily be compared to BAT FUCK INSANE and even APE SHIT CRAZY. However, it is known more simply to most biologists as the OHSHITLETSPISSOUTOFHEREFASTBEFOREITEXPLODES!mode. This is when a completely FUCKED OVER catsodomizer runs teh hell around the ,place givin everyone, including dead goats, their finishing move: TEH BUTT CRAMP FROM HELL!!. even rapists are no match for the catsodomizer when it is in butt cramp mode, whereupon they become rapetastic. some would argue that the experience of being given a butt cramp by a catsodomizer is far worse than being raped by 15 dead and 15 living goats at the EXACT SAME TIME!! this fact has astounded not only biologists, but also retards and assholes for many centuries, ever since George Bush(undisputed king of the assholes) was handpicked by God to be president of the United States.
Retrieved from "http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/User_talk:Elhobbit"
Catsodomizerz [edit source]
Elhobbit 13:25, January 24, 2010 (UTC)
lol, wut?[edit source]
I really have no idea what is going on here. Lets put content aside for a moment: you do realize, Elhobbit, that when you make a new article, you don't simply copy-paste the text into a pee review page, you make the page, then submit the page to pee review, as per the guidelines. Read up on that before you submit some new material.
Secondly, your 'content' seems more like the brainfart of a 13 year old adolescent than an article of parody-driven humor. Expand it, revise it, and organize it, resubmit it properly, and I would be happy to do a review for you.
-- 13:23 EST 24 January, 2010
| Humour: | 0.5 | you know what, I'll review this just to get it off the articles that need reviewing page... I'll give you a .5 simply because your unintentional spelling error of the word the turns out to be an internet meme. This is quite simply not funny. |
| Concept: | 2 | umm, so I'm guessing this is supposed to be some sort of mythic creature or something? I really can't tell. |
| Prose and formatting: | 1 | not a zero just because you at least have the courtesy to make paragraphs for that mess. You have numerous spelling errors and multiple syntax and grammar problems. This does not resemble an encyclopedia article in the least, you have no links, no headings, etc. |
| Images: | 0 | you have no images... |
| Miscellaneous: | 1 | I suppose you could salvage this if you kept the name and completely re-did it. Seeing as you don't have a userpage yet and the state of this mess and your method of seeking out a review, I don't have high hopes for this... |
| Final Score: | 4.5 | what a mess. Son, I suggest you get acquainted with Uncyclopedia's user guidelines and such so that in the future you and your material can be taken much more seriously. |
| Reviewer: | -- 0845 EST 1 February, 2010 | |