Talk:Uncyclopedia is the best

The sequel to Uncyclopedia is the worst, from the pen of IP 193.60.223.134. --Hindleyite Talk 10:36, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Work in progress

Is this finished? I think we should slap on a {WIP}, because it seems aside from a few minor things, this is just a copy/paste of Uncyclopedia is the worst. If not, then slap on an NRV, because as it stands, it sucks. --Moogle.EXE 17:19, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

You've got my permission for a quick huffing, unless someone wants to adopt it and give it a good home. If not delete, I suggest NRV. --Hindleyite Talk 17:24, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Give me 24 hours, if all fails, maybe we could redirect to Sarcasm? --Moogle.EXE 17:27, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Here's the (complicated) deal with this article. I created it because I checked Uncyclopedia is the worst one morning and noticed it had changed dramatically. I reverted it back to my original version, because it is totally different than the tone I wanted to create. However, the 'vandalism' made me laugh, so I thought it might be funny to create a 'retaliation' article, which would be a sort of a vadalised version of the original. I later changed my mind and was going to request a delete. Instead, I decided I may revisit it some time in the future. --Hindleyite Talk 17:37, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Wow

I don't believe this has survived so long. :P -- Hindleyite Converse • ?pedia 11:08, July 21, 2011 (UTC)

It is even still here towards the end of 2013. Either it is secretly better than everyone thinks or someone isn't doing their job. --Whyhow (talk) 05:04, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Someone's not doing their job. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Nov 9 '13 5:12 (UTC)