Talk:Uncyclopedia is Stupid
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Isn't this redundant to Uncyclopedia is the worst? – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 02:56, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- Oh, maybe. I've never read Uncy is the worst and just looked at it. It may have the same flow in some parts. I just saw this guy leave this page and started in on it. Maybe it can end here, or if people want to keep it going, I don't know. The difference seems to be that the red-link user started it off with what seems to be a sincere rant, and I was just following his lead. I'd say if he or she wrote it as satire, then yes, it's redundant. But if they were serious then it shifts the satire into the state of unintended consequences satire where the very things the user rants against turn on him and his own article becomes one of those things. Hinges on that, I would say. Does that make sense? Aleister 3:04 2-1-14
- It does. Uncyclopedia is the worst is like that too, but I suppose having two such articles can't hurt. – Llwy-ar-lawr (talk • contribs • logs) 04:25, 2 January 2014 (UTC)