Talk:Tojo Books

Well, you did ask for help

I'm drawing a blank. Sorry. Maybe I should stop holding my breath. The closest I got to the Pacific theatre in WWII was the Zero model I had as a child (which puts me out of water for a mashup on books/Tojo). While I do have a foot-long model of the Yamato, that's mostly because it's the Star Blazers version. Did I mention that I'm a geek? Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 04:53, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Pee Review

An review, as rekwested in IRC. Let it be known that this is the first, and probably last time I shall ever utter the phrase "an review."

Humour:	7	Generally a mixed bag. There are some great moments throughout (the Origami Air Force, "code yodeling," the entire "Sunday Suprise" section). Most of it is quite funny. I'd work on the speech at the beginning. I understand what you're going for, but the speech seems almost too dry, perhaps just because it's so long that it begins to wear thing. The minute the speech is through, my interest in the article started building again. Perhaps adding a few more light, goofy, "chocolate" moments into some of the dryer parts of the article, to keep things moving and keep the absurd and the subtle well-mixed.
Concept:	9	Love the idea. This will be great when it's done.
Prose and formatting:	8	The exact sort of prose that works best for this kind of parody--exactly like Wikipedia prose, with few exceptions.
Images:	7	The pictures are good--no 'chops, but they work really well with the feel of the article. Some of the captions could be improved, methinks, but that's not a huge problem.
Miscellaneous:	7	A miscellaneous score of seven, because this article was mercilessly attacked by a goatse vandal and earned my sympathy.
Final Score:	38	I really like it so far. The current world war II article is a piece of shit; all it would take would be a change of title here, perhaps shortening it to make room for a full account of the struggle of the bookkeepers, and this could become a rewrite of our article on WWII. Hope my review was helpful.
Reviewer:	--THE 03:28, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Good article, if a little subtle/arcane --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 06:57, 8 August 2008 (UTC)