Talk:Phonics

Please tell me what you think! And please add, this article has a lot of potention for additions I think!

roflcopters, that pic =). Can you make it look a little better though? --Nytrospawn 22:08, 15 Mar 2005 (EST)

that a bit better? :) --Metaphysical 22:24, 15 Mar 2005 (EST)

=)--Nytrospawn 23:07, 15 Mar 2005 (EST)

Quite honestly, I preferred the subtelty (sp?) of the first picture and caption, but OK... --Savethemooses 12:01, 16 Mar 2005 (EST)

Can we lose the reference to the Boston Herald?

If it were a free article that would be fine but buying the text of the article seems like nothing but blatant advertising via Wiki to me. --12.31.208.217 14:14, 20 Oct 2005 (UTC)

What's the point in taking it off? It isn't advertisement. In fact, I think it's stupid that I'd have to pay 4 bucks to access the last 2 inches of an article in which one of my brilliant pages was referenced. It's not just a reference, either; this article really was mentioned in the Boston Herald.

pwned.

--Savethemooses 21:16, 20 Oct 2005 (UTC)

New and Improved

Phonics has been refurbished for a new generation. See the difference for yourself. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 18:49, 21 May 2007 (UTC)

STM works his magic! --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 14:00, 6 May 2008 (UTC)