Talk:Essay in the Jones of text

I don't get it. What's the underlying concept? --Andorin Kato 09:57, November 30, 2009 (UTC)

The concept? Let me put it this way: you will have to approach the problem methodically. First, locate the biggest obstacle. Then move on from there - always asking the correct questions, for instance: "What's up, Doc?" -- Style  Guide 10:20, November 30, 2009 (UTC)

Also, typos are a state of mind, just like the cornucopia was a burlesque action thermometer. Women, wine, artistic chains - all of this boils down to one thing: biker turbulence. I hope I have made myself clear. I really hope I have. -- Style  Guide 11:41, November 30, 2009 (UTC)

On the other hand, there is a point there; when the Marquis of Queensberg called Oscar Wilde a "sonodynite", a "somodomite" or a "so-so-so-tite", nobody laughed either. -- Style  Guide 12:47, November 30, 2009 (UTC)

Oh I get it now... it's stupid. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 15:53, November 30, 2009 (UTC)

But of course!-- Style  Guide 16:07, November 30, 2009 (UTC)

In that case I love it. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 09:50, December 1, 2009 (UTC)

Your reasoning is as weird as my uncle's, who never understood why tomatoes need a kindergarten. In any case, I accept your loving the article with a herring up my cavity! -- Style  Guide 10:13, December 1, 2009 (UTC)

I don't get it

Again: who does, and why should anyone? -- Style  Guide 21:41, December 23, 2009 (UTC)

On a yet different note: there are baskets and baskets full of cases. Metal caskets. You'll not get closer to MY truth, which is: I will hit you again one of these days (talking to my cock here). If this is too much, try to keep in mind there's also another essay in the, erm, that thingy, which you also should read. There isn't? It's a red link? FUCK IT. -- Style  Guide 09:04, March 30, 2010 (UTC)