Talk:Diplomacy

Nice article so far. --thematrixeætsyou, the kickass foo (talk) (flames) 06:44, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. That'll be $8.50 per joke. --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 18:25, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Looks like a probably feature once completed - great already :) RabbiTechno 18:26, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

From Pee Review

Formerly a red link on Isra1337's page of important-ful topics, this article is now a blue link on the aforementioned page.

But the question remains, ladies and gentlemen: Is... it... not crap? --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 07:27, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Humour:	9	Good Use Of Humour Like the Way Diplomacy Is Referred To As Violence and the complete opposite of real diplomacy
Concept:	10	Cleaver idea, well executed
Prose and formatting:	9	good use of language
Images:	8	like the guy with the hammer but could of used another picture in the bottom section
Miscellaneous:	9	like the table. it helps get the idea across
Final Score:	45	Overall great article. needs a few more pictures in my opinion though
Reviewer:	Bonner 13:15, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Good Diplomacy

In other words, be Nikita Khrushchev... --Gamma287 ☭Tetяis? 01:24, 20 February 2013 (UTC)