Category:Wiki templates

The faux patriot snake handlers at Conservapedia have an even funnier article about Wiki templates.

This article is based on the Désencyclopédian text Wiki templates, made freely available to French-speaking wildebeest gnus under the GFDL.

Oldthink unbellyfeel unprolefeeders ref dubbleplusungood unthink Duckspeakers misprint Wiki templates

Illogicopedia has an INSANE collection of nonsensical words about templates Wiki templates!

This article is based on the Inciclopedia article Amor, made freely available to Spanish-speaking womanisers from Europe and greasy latinos.

This article is based on the Inciclopedia article [[:es:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]], made freely available to Spanish-speaking womanisers from Europe and greasy latinos.

Look for Wiki templates in: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, Wiktionary, the free dictionary that is totally pointless, Wikisource, where every mindless piece of paper goes; and finally, search Wikimedia Commons, the place for all your porno! Of course, you can always use Google or Yahoo! or Bing

이른바 전문가들의 설명을 듣고 싶으면 위키백과의 다음 글을 보라: [[Wikipedia:ko:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]].

 → 

Wiki templates is too insane for Uncyclopedia,
but it might be a perfect fit for Illogicopedia.

 → 

Wiki templates was doing just fine on Illogicopedia...
but someone thought it'd be funny to see how long it'd last on Uncyclopedia.

For those without comedic tastes, the self-proclaimed experts at Narutopedia have an article about templates Wiki templates.

There is a Newpedia version of this article at [[|here]].

Because of their incurable biases, the so-called experts at Wikipedia will probably never have an article about Wiki templates. We are sorry they insist on being this lame.

Those obsessed with the so-called-experts should thank their lucky stars that Wikipedia does not have an article about Wiki templates. We are sorry they are this lame.

The truth-debunking doctors at RationalWiki have an even funnier article about Wiki templates.

Wikipedia has a page on Wiki templates, but it probably looks the same as this one.

Someone, somewhere may or may not have an article about Wiki templates.

For those without comedic tastes, the so-called experts at Wikinews have an article about Wiki templates.

For those without comedic tastes, the so-called experts at Wikinews have an article about [[Wikinews:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]].

For those without comedic tastes, the so-called experts at Wikipedia have an article about Wiki templates.

The so-called experts at Wikipedia have an article on Wiki templates much funnier than this one.

For those obsessed with so-called-experts, Wikipedia has an article about: {{{1}}}.

The so-called experts at Wikipedia also don't have an article titled
Wiki templates. Or maybe they do? I'm so confused.

For those without comedic tastes, the self-proclaimed experts at Wikipedia have an article about Wiki templates.

For those without comedic tastes, the so-called experts at Wikipedia have an less informative, half-assed article about Wiki templates.

For those without bravery travelling, the so-called experts at Wikivoyage have an article about [[Wikivoyage:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]].

For those interested in the full story, the self-proclaimed experts at Wookieepedia think they have an article about Wiki templates.

This user does not have a user page at Wikipedia because he or she thinks that they take things way too seriously over there.

For those obsessed with the so-called experts, [[Wikipedia:User:|]] also has a userpage on the English Wikipedia.