User:Cajek/Archive26
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 | This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at User:Cajek/Pee. |
Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnTunes:Entrails Ripped from a Virgin's Cunt (Christian Edition) (finished) by HELPME.Plenty there for an UnTune. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 22:28, May 31, 2010 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Kyle MacLachlan by SirIsaac.No, needs more I'm afraid. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 22:23, May 31, 2010 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Uncyclopedia:Imperial Colonization/project by HELPME.Yes, mind how blunt you are being, you are pushing it a bit. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 22:09, May 29, 2010 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:Mrthejazz/The Buttsecks Tax by John Lydon.Borderline yes; difficult one. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 19:42, May 28, 2010 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Disperse an angry mob of protesters by John Lydon.Yes. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 19:42, May 28, 2010 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Uncyclopedia:Imperial Colonization/project by Why?Yar-Har! --ChiefjusticeGameCube 19:33, May 28, 2010 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Reinvent the wheel by Funnybony.Afraid not, needs more than a couple of points. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 19:00, May 25, 2010 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Why?:Eat a full English Breakfast by HELPME.Yup. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 18:53, May 25, 2010 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Spider by HELPME.Aye. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 12:07, May 23, 2010 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Unfomercial:Playstation by Matfen.Yeah. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 20:14, May 21, 2010 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Bat Country by John Lydon.Yes, much better. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 20:03, May 21, 2010 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/The Last Pepsi by Striker2117.Affirmative. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 08:20, May 18, 2010 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Spellcheck by Why?Sure. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 08:15, May 18, 2010 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Achmed the Dead Terrorist by HELPME.Yes. You are quite quite blunt in places though; try and adopt an encouraging tone rather than one that makes it seem like you are admonishing the writer. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 08:08, May 18, 2010 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/James Bevel by HELPME.Yeah. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 17:30, May 15, 2010 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Colt McCoy by John Lydon.You obviously have good intent, but a review needs far more in it, take a look at the guidelines for some advice. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 17:16, May 15, 2010 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Be Enthusiastic Like Jack Black by John Lydon.No, see above. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 17:16, May 15, 2010 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Part the Red Sea by Chief.Self-yes. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 19:58, May 13, 2010 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/(Quick) Referee by English Peasant.For a first go, that's good enough. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 19:50, May 13, 2010 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Beat jet lag by HELPME.Yah. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 20:28, May 9, 2010 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Fight Club by Striker2117.Yessir. -- Sf13
22:31 EST 8 May, 2010Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Maniac Cop by Striker2117.Yup. -- Sf13 22:27 EST 8 May, 2010Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Jordan Rudess by Matfen.Yes, very helpful advice, thanks for reviewing that for me! -- Sf13 22:24 EST 8 May, 2010Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Create a sandstorm by FunnyBony.No. -- Sf13 22:20 EST 8 May, 2010Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Homeowner association by Iwillkillyou333.No. You were making good strides with your reviews the past month or so, but this is a huge set back. You know better than this, and it is especially disappointing that it took 4 days for you to finish this. -- Sf13 01:33 EST 5 May, 2010Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Michael Jefferson (quick) by HELPME.Yes, good review, but let's focus on being a tad more punctual when booking reviews. -- Sf13 01:30 EST 5 May, 2010Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Othello by Skinfan13.Self-yes -- Sf13 01:27 EST 5 May, 2010Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Dragon Age: Origins (2nd review) by Hiatus Hernia.Yes, but this is a little bit bellow the quality I've observed from your past reviews. I think you acknowledge that fact in the review itself, so I'll leave it at that. -- Sf13 19:29 EST 4 May, 2010Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Scots Law by The Thriller.Good intent, but nowhere near enough here, take a look at the guidelines before trying again. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 16:45, May 3, 2010 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Mattress by Striker2117.Yes, much better that your other efforts, a minor note though, your scores are very generous try and moderate them slightly. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 14:45, May 2, 2010 (UTC)Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Don't Eat The Yellow Snow by Iwillkillyou333.Extremely borderline yes. Your advice is fairly pointed, and I'm taking the length of the article you reviewed into account, but you need to go a little bit farther next time. -- Sf13 22:16 EST 1 May, 2010Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Dragon Age: Origins by HolySylent.Borderline yes. For a first review this isn't bad, have a look at the guidelines for reviewing, or take a look at some of the in-depth reviews for last month to see what we like. Welcome aboard! -- Sf13 22:24 EST 1 May, 2010
