Uncyclopedia talk:Aristocrat's Turkey Day Ball/judging2013

Judging

Question: On the main page, it says I should judge using this:

The 3-person judging panel shall individually score each entry using a specified 1-to-10 scoring template not unlike the one used for Pee Review. The elements in question shall include:

1. Overall Humor – Judges shall decide this field based on the entry they find the funniest, regardless of other judging fields.
2. Delivery of Humorous Elements – As the delivery of this joke shall be textual, judges shall decide this field based on their perception of the joke's delivery in this medium.
3. Use of Obscenity and Profanity – Profanity, obscenity, debauchery and lewdness are inherent elements of The Aristocrat's. However, it is the clever utilization of these elements that determine their effectiveness in conveying the humor of the joke. As such, herein judges shall decide the effectiveness of this field.
4. Miscellaneous – Points awarded for style, originality, design flourish, etc. depending upon the opinions of the judge.

however.....

on the judging page it tells me I should simply "Rank the articles or images from 1 to 5, with 1 being the best."

Which is it? - S_t^raⁱ_nj 1 . . . . TALK 23:23, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Not sure, that's why I'm happy I got stuck with the section that only got one article! :P --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 04:04, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

You can use the system with 1-10 scoring to determine which is the best article, and then rank them from 1-5. Or you can use your own system to determine which is the best article. -- The Zombiebaron 15:43, 15 December 2013 (UTC)