Forum:Automatic voting
Hi, here's the other post I promised. I think it would be neat if the voting for VFH and VFP were set up automatically, so that the score would be instantly updated and all the formatting would be done simply and stuff.
I made a demonstration to show you what I mean: http://www.mandaliet.com/uncycvote/ Go there and check that out or I'll cry.
Of course this might not be necessary or doable, but there it is.—Sir Mandaliet ♠ CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 19:12, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, that's pretty sweet... but we can only use a limited amount of html on uncyc, so it'd take alot of code work to set it up... Idk, maybe Algorithm could work on it.
t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 19:18, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
Great idea, Combined with a protocol on voting deadlines and low / high limits for deletion or possible features of nominated stuff instead of hack'n'slash deletion policy by some admins. That could piss a lot of people of! , all for it then . - Vosnul 20:57, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
- It isn't that hard to do it with just a numbered list. ENWP does that for very large votes. --Splaka 02:29, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
For
- For. -Bob
- For. -Bob
- For. -Bob
- For. -Bob
- For. -Bob
- For. -Bob
- For. -Bob
- For. -Bob
- For. -Bob
- For. -Bob
- For. -Bob
- For. -Bob
Against
- Against. -Joe
- Against. -Joe
- Against. -Joe
- Against. -Joe
- Against. -Joe
- Against. -Joe
I'm a fucking noob
- Against. - Tompkins
- Comment: And comments/replies to votes screw it up too, without using awkward <br>s. -Spang
- Comment Since we don't seem to like replies and comments to votes ANYWAY, and any misplaced votes we just rollback, there is no prob. This method can work. Exmaple: Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship. --Splaka
- But then there's always the Tompkins that doesn't know what the hell he's doing, and doesn't even really care for that matter... t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 02:34, 23 June 2006 (UTC)