User talk:Rev joshua

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Welcome![edit source]

Hello, Rev joshua, and welcome to Uncyclopedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If not, the door's right over there... no, a little more to your left... yeah. Anyway, here are a few good links for nooblets:

If you read anything at all, make it the above two links. If you want to find out more about Uncyclopedia or need more help with something, try these:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button (Button sig.png) above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, ask me on my talk page, ask at the Dump, or add the following: {{help}} to this page along with a message and someone will come along and help you if they can. Again, welcome! ----The Zombiebaron 02:56, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Gesundheit[edit source]

Hi there, Rev Joshua. I've just taken another gander at your article, and noticed that Zombiebaron has placed a VNRV on there. So I decided to read the article again and see if the tag could be removed. And what do you know? I liked it. It seemed very well written, it can be enjoyed by all (ETSUers and non-ETSUers alike) and it no longer seemed like you were out to ridicule all those who have caused you discomfort. "Yay", you might glee! "My article can stay!"
Well... Kind of... You see, after reading it, I was curious as to what the facts were that you humorously skewed, and which bits were completely fictional. So I went to have a look at Wikipedia's entry on this academic institution and... well... Let's just say that I haven't felt this disappointed since I found out that "Teen Spirit" was actually a brand of deodorant.
Just kidding (about the disappointment). It's not like you're the first ever user to spork a Wikipedia article and to work from there. Hell, you even differ from most sporkers by not just replacing a few nouns with other nonsensical random ones. It's just... I dunno... I find it's a bit of a pity when it's not an original Uncyclopedia-entry.
So, I guess what I'm trying to say is that if you would feel up to reformulating/reformatting the article so it looks different enough from its boring bigger brother, I would appreciate it a lot... I'd even remove the VNRV for you! :D
In any case, thanks for your contributions so far and I hope to see a bit more of your works in the near future. Have a good one! ~ sin($) tan() 00:30, 3 February 2007 (UTC)