User talk:Monika/TuringTestRewrite

From Pee Review

(Again with the writer's block unless this is here.)

So this isn't done or anything, and I pretty much know where I'm going with it, but I'm hoping I can get someone looking over my shoulder checking my math and giving me feedback and whatnot... Well?

--monika 00:57, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

So I've finished the AI/Robotics part of the article. Now I just need to write the Cold War/CIA part of the article and make images and whatnot. I'm worried this is going to need to be an article with a shitton of wikipedia links. Someone please tell me they get it without needing to do too much research ::puppy dog eyes:: --monika 04:40, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Bump for writer's block. --monika 21:38, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

The reason this hasn't been reviewed is that it's a big meaty article with a non-funny introduction. As a prospective reviewer I couldn't face the prospect of wading through an entire like the start, but couldn't very well be rude about it with so much unread. Sort the intro and the rest will follow. --Kelpan 22:57, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Which... part of the introduction isn't funny? --monika 23:19, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

I am reminded of a conversation I sometimes have with people on the net that goes something like this: “I’m an artificial intelligence taking the Turing test on line.” “You have failed, then, if you are telling me this.” “No I haven’t, because you don’t actually believe me.” I hope this helps break your writer’s block. Feel free to come up with your own variation on this joke if you are so inclined.Verp 07:08, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Heh. This one time when I was TAing AI, I wrote on the cardboard box outside my office for homework in-turning, "This box passes the Turing Test. Try talking to it." I don't think anyone did though... --monika 20:31, 27 January 2008 (UTC)