User talk:Medvedev/David DeAngelo's newsletter
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
From Pee Review[edit source]
The idea was brewing in my head for some time. I finally put it to "paper" and would appreciate any feedback. Note: I tried to maintain neutrality, but it's HARD. Feel free to point out which sections of the article are the most biased.
Humour: | 10 | This article is fucking hilarious! I was almost unsure what I was reading at first, and the formatting frightened me a bit, but once I got into it I found the brilliance. A+ |
Concept: | 8 | I like the newsletter concept itself. Original; I just don't know if others will appreciate it as much (a lot of people are adamant about the mock-encyclopedia entry formatting. I prefer it usually, but these exceptions I also like very much). |
Prose and formatting: | 7 | The prose is great, captures this guy's ridiculousness well. A little MUCH with the EMPHASIZED WORDS, but I didn't notice until like 3/4 of the way through. The formatting (spacing in particular) needs to be revised, but I can see the problem with changing that and keeping the newsletter-style in tact. This, I leave up to you. |
Images: | 6 | I like the ones that are there. First one works perfectly with the caption. The second is a cool chop, but could use a better caption. And in general, more pics would be good. Come to think of it, maybe a logo or seal would be nice, to keep in the newsletter styling. |
Miscellaneous: | 10 | You have made me laugh this evening, and for that, I applaud you. |
Final Score: | 41 | Please keep up with this article. Great work. |
Reviewer: | THINKER 06:32, 15 April 2007 (UTC) |