User talk:Mazman343405

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Newcookie.gif Somebody has awarded you a cookie!
Now go play in traffic.


Hello, Mazman343405, and welcome to Uncyclopedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If not, the door's right over there... no, a little more to your left... yeah. Anyway, here are a few good links for nooblets:
Beginner's Guide
and...
How to be funny and not just stupid
If you read anything at all, please make it the above two links. It'll be worth your while. If you want to find out more about Uncyclopedia or need more help with something, try these:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button (Button sig.png) above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date.
If you need help, ask me on my talk page, ask in the Forums, or add the following: {{help}} to this page along with a message and someone will come along and help you if they can. Additionally, the Uncyclopedia Adopt-a-Noob program is there to bring experienced editors straight to you. Simply put {{adoptme}} on your Userpage to join.
If you have any burning questions that you want to ask, come join us on our IRC channel at; irc://irc.freenode.net/uncyclopedia if your browser has a inbuilt client (Like Opera or Firefox with the Chatzilla plugin) just click on that link. If you have another IRC client plug these mystical co-ordinates into it:
  • server: irc.freenode.net
  • port: 6667
  • channel: #uncyclopedia
And finally If you have none of the above you can use the :irc.wikia.com/uncyclopedia web based CGI client
Enjoy your stay at Uncyclopedia :)
BonSig.png (Bonner) (Talk) Jun 3, 15:58

American Airlines[edit source]

The best place to go if you want an article reviewed is Pee Review as the good people there will happily review your article and give you pointers on how to make it better. I had a quick look over your article and it looks like it's shaping up pretty well. You need to add some links to other articles though, as it's a little of a deadend at the moment. BonSig.png (Bonner) (Talk) Jul 12, 10:33

pee review test[edit source]

Humour: 7 Probably the most important, article-wise. How funny is it? Why is it funny? How can it be funnier? Suggestions for improvement and highlights of specific problems are very helpful.
Concept: 9 How good an idea is behind the article? Is it original with lots of potential? Could the concept be expanded and in what way?
Prose and formatting: 8 The writing style, spelling, grammar, layout and overall appearance. Is it written in an encyclopedic style? If not, are there good reasons for this? Does the voice work?
Images: 5 How are the images? Are they relevant, with good quality and formatting? If the writer has no photochopping skills, encourage the use of captions to make normal images funny.
Miscellaneous: 7.3 Either use Template:Pee to workout an average for you ({{pee|7|9|8|5}} in this case), or give a score to compensate for the article's overall quality--something that can't always be assessed by the previous numbers alone.
Final Score: 36.3 Overall summation. How much can it be improved and what are the most important areas to work on.
Reviewer: Please sign using the normal ~~~~


not sure what you mean as regards uploading images in reference to your message on my page. --Romartus 11:46, 28 February 2009 (UTC)