User:The Thinker/TDayVote07
User:Thekillerfroggy/The Bureaucrats
| Overall Humo(u)r: |
8.5 - I was worried when I saw the Jimbo Wales, thinking it'd be a bunch of in-jokey nonsense. And though there is a little of Uncyc reference, thank God I was wrong in my initial knee-jerk reaction. This telling had me laughing out loud. Excellent, really excellent. | |
| Delivery: |
7 - A fairly standard text-based telling. Decent pic captions. | |
| Miscellaneous/Bonus: |
9 - TKF obviously understands the concept of this joke, and really put some great material forward for it. | |
| Final Score: |
24.5 | |
| Judge: |
THINKER 06:14, 11 December 2007 (UTC) | |
User:15Mickey20/The Aristocrats
| Overall Humo(u)r: |
6 - I love the "leave it to the imagination" approach, though it kinda made me smile warmly more than laugh boisterously. | |
| Delivery: |
10 - Extremely clever. | |
| Miscellaneous/Bonus: |
5 - I liked it greatly, and if this was the actual Aristocrats article, I'd probably vote for it on VFH. However, for the purposes of this competition, I'm going for the more traditionalist route. This is really innovative, and I like it very much though. | |
| Final Score: |
21 | |
| Judge: |
THINKER 06:14, 11 December 2007 (UTC) | |
User:An Ape that Only Exists on Thursdays/Aristocrats
| Overall Humo(u)r: |
7 - A solid telling, which definitely drew some good laughs. | |
| Delivery: |
4 - Style points for the joke itself, but no pics, no spruce. | |
| Miscellaneous/Bonus: |
8 - I appreciate the straight-forward approach, so points awarded. | |
| Final Score: |
19 | |
| Judge: |
THINKER 06:14, 11 December 2007 (UTC) | |
| Overall Humo(u)r: |
8 - The elaborate intro had me laughing, and the Mix-Tape song selection was awesome. The meat of the act is a bit understated, but in a good way. | |
| Delivery: |
7 The picture works, the conciseness works, and the talent agent loving it also works. Very excellent. | |
| Miscellaneous/Bonus: |
7 There just feels like, for a Zombiebaron concoction, something is a bit lacking. Perhaps its another pic, perhaps its a little more meat later on to balance the initial hilarity of the intro. I can't say for sure. But regardless, an excellently strong showing. | |
| Final Score: |
22 | |
| Judge: |
THINKER 06:14, 11 December 2007 (UTC) | |
| Overall Humo(u)r: |
6 - A concept piece, and I appreciate that, but I know there is so much more in that head of yours So So. | |
| Delivery: |
4 - Again, a concept piece, but just kind of flat. And no visuals to boot. | |
| Miscellaneous/Bonus: |
6 - When I saw So So as an entry, I was expecting the grandest of all tellings, pitting amazingly sharp mental prowess against sick, insane debauchery. I just don't see that here, which saddens me greatly. | |
| Final Score: |
16 | |
| Judge: |
THINKER 06:14, 11 December 2007 (UTC) | |
| Overall Humo(u)r: |
8 - Now this exemplifies the notion of taking a concept piece and running with it to the fullest extent possible. Excellent! | |
| Delivery: |
6 - Great use of dialogue over action, and fits within the story arc, but a few sprucings would've helped. | |
| Miscellaneous/Bonus: |
8 - For going in a completely opposite direction, but still making it hilarious, and having me rather tickled inside. | |
| Final Score: |
21 | |
| Judge: |
THINKER 06:14, 11 December 2007 (UTC) | |