User:Shabidoo/happymonkeycompetition/2013/MrN9000
Pee reviews for: MrN9000
Article: Kevin Smith
Pee Review from Shabidoo
| Creativity: | 2.5/10 |
The concept was very original...but there is next to zero creativity in your article...that being copying the wikipedia article and changing a few words to penis related phallic cocks. Would have been nice to have seen more of your high level of creativity. |
| Originality: | 10/10 |
I get the concept...referencing the fork by making the article appear slightly different from the original one. Its a good idea...I don't think it's been done before. So...good marks for that. Only strategically changing a couple things of the opening paragraph was also a good idea...especially making them mostly penis jokes. The effect was good...as it took me a little time to realise that the rest of the article was identical to the wikipedia one. |
| Humour: | 3/10 |
The variety of penis jokes had me chuckling. Especially the title of the film "cocks". Though the humour rests only on a couple dick jokes...so...let's say 3 points for that. |
| Final Score: | 15.5/30 |
So yeah...just over the half way mark...which I think would be an F+ in an American highschool. Very cool idea with the whole fork thing...bummer that your unique contribution ended after only a couple paragraphs. |
Pee Review from ¡¡¡Y¡¡¡
| Creativity: | 8/10 |
. |
| Originality: | 8/10 |
. |
| Humour: | 8/10 |
. |
| Final Score: | 24/30 |
. |
Pee Review from Multiliteralist
| Creativity: | 9/10 |
I'm almost out of anything to say to this one. |
| Originality: | 8/10 |
In the area of "this kind of articles" this certainly takes the prize. |
| Humour: | 9/10 |
Fucking unreadable. I laughed my ass off when I realized that. I only didn't give 10 because I like those articles I actually can read. |
| Final Score: | 26/30 |
All right MrN. |
| Score | Comment |
|---|---|
| 6/10 | Put comment here: |