User:15Mickey20/Judgocrats

1. User:So So/crats. A clear winner. The cutesiness made a great contrast to the impending depravity and the surprise end was very well done.
2. User:Syndrome/crats. Another well written article which keeps the reader waiting for the inevitable sex fiendery. The only problem is that it never quite comes. I don't necessarily mind that the act itself is never described, but perhaps some clues could be given in the description of the four men.
3. User:Hey people!/Hey people it's The Aristocrats. This came very close to second spot. Again it contrasts the respectable with the degraded, but perhaps there's too much filth. It's all done in one go and it might have been better if it was broken up a bit by creating more of a conversation between receptionist and dog. I liked the last bit, though.

Thanks for the Judgery

Thanks for drudgering judging my article; sorry you had to wade through read it. I'd like your thoughts on it too, if I may impose. (Next contest I'll try to be moar clever than just changing the joke from "Aristocrats" to "AristoCatz" to take advantage of a lame internet meme as the central theme of my humor.)  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  09:57, December 20, 2009 (UTC)