Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Rule of Three
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Rule of Three[edit source]
ScottBurnan 11:10, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
| Humour: | 8 | Very, very funny. Articles written in the style of the subject are probably the only self-referencing ones that actually work, and it works fantastically well here. Keeping the article brief was a good move, becuase it stops the joke from going stale. |
| Concept: | 8 | A universal topic that has been well-mined for humour. The Rule might be a little obscure (and unlikely to ever have its parody searched for), but it's easily understood anyway. |
| Prose and formatting: | 10 | Well-written piece, as befitting an article on a language technique. No complaints! |
| Images: | 5 | Bit light on pictures, though that is probably best given how short the article is. Lesbian picture is extremely irrelevant, but that's Uncyclopedia. That makes it qualify for NSFW though. |
| Miscellaneous: | 7.8 | Averaged your score. |
| Final Score: | 38.8 | Only needs work on the images, they could be better chosen in my opinion. You may wish to at least add a third to fit the rule! (not counting the Wikipedia template) If you're keeping the lesbian pic, tag the article as NSFW. |
| Reviewer: | BlackHarrier32 15:00, 11 September 2008 (UTC) | |