Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/George McClellan

Main

Current

Reviewed

Archive

Guidelines

FAQ

Committee

RotM

George McClellan

SirIsaac 20:33, May 29, 2010 (UTC)

I got this one --—John Lydon 13:46, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

Humour:	8	This is one of the few articles I've ever read on here that actually made me laugh out loud while reading it. You're jokes are not only funny, but you also managed to fit them all seemlessly into the article. I fully expected something along the lines of a joke about space aliens or giant robot penis' but you based all your humor in reality. It really is hillarious. The only suggestion I would make is the line: "McClellan being a bigwig in the Union Army is kind of ironic, as he was an enormous racist and disliked the idea of emancipation. Still, if it meant he got to shoot at people, whatever." It's extremely funny, but I think it feels like an afterthought based on where its placed. I would recommend moving this into the first paragraph somewhere.
Concept:	7	I have to admit, when I think of funny topics, Civil War General doesn't even crack the top 100. Which makes it all the more impressive that you were able to take a rather bland topic and make it really funny. Well done.
Prose and formatting:	9	I thought the way you approached this topic was fantastic. I really felt like I was reading an encyclopedia article on McClellan. I could actually picture him organizing troops by height and odor. To me, thats the hallmark of funny. If I can actually picture it, it makes it a thousand times funnier.
Images:	5	The images were the only things I didn't find humorous about the article. Not that they were bad, just not very funny. I think the pictures themselves are relevant but the captions could use a little work. Itchy chest disease is no laughing matter. Seriously, I just didn't find the itchy chest to be all that funny. Maybe its just because I'm a sick individual but something like "McClellan was obsessed with nipple play" or something like that would appeal to me much more.
Miscellaneous:	7.3	Average score
Final Score:	36.3	I will be noming this article. It deserves to be featured.
Reviewer:	--—John Lydon 14:12, June 2, 2010 (UTC)