Template talk:2010Top10
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Why are we not using image:TopTen10.png, as prepared by Lyrithia? ~ 06:55, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Because I didn't know that she had done one until after we hadaround 5 other versions floating around
- Because this is unfinalised and doesn't have community consensus
- Because it's always good to have options
- Nominally Humane! some time Monday, 10:37, Jan 17 2011 UTC
For. Continuity's sake, I say we use the image currently on the template. --
08:42 EST 17 JAN 2011- What is this continuity you speak of? ~ 14:41, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
- The previous "top 10" stamp used in 09 looks like this one... --
- Not anymore, it doesn't... because I'm not going to let you guys bully me anymore! No more, I say! *stands up and bangs her head on the ceiling and passes out* ~ 16:53, 17 January 2011
11:35 EST 17 JAN 2011
- The previous "top 10" stamp used in 09 looks like this one... --
Excuse me while I barge in here and... *hits POTR with a frying pan*
I blame bullying. Zombiebaron and PotR bullied me. ~ 14:46, 17 January 2011
- L, the only issue that I see is - it seems that your stamp is behind the text rather than in front of it? Or do I imagine things again? ~ 14:48, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Zombiebaron set the z-index to -100. Of course it would be behind after that, but... wait, which stamp? ~ 15:01, 17 January 2011
- Yours. ~ 15:03, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Which one? They bullied me into making another one. ~ 15:08, 17 January 2011
- The original one that you've presented at the forum. ~ 15:16, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, they're all behind the text... that one's just angled more than the others for some reason. See? ~ 15:23, 17 January 2011
- Yep. For some reason, when I've tested it earlier it came out really hidden. ~ 15:27, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Well, the sizes are weird... and now Olipro's been bullying me, too. o__o ~ 16:09, 17 January 2011
- Yep. For some reason, when I've tested it earlier it came out really hidden. ~ 15:27, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, they're all behind the text... that one's just angled more than the others for some reason. See? ~ 15:23, 17 January 2011
- The original one that you've presented at the forum. ~ 15:16, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Which one? They bullied me into making another one. ~ 15:08, 17 January 2011
- Yours. ~ 15:03, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Zombiebaron set the z-index to -100. Of course it would be behind after that, but... wait, which stamp? ~ 15:01, 17 January 2011
- L, the only issue that I see is - it seems that your stamp is behind the text rather than in front of it? Or do I imagine things again? ~ 14:48, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Despite my frying pan injuries, I would prefer to see Lyra's original design. The only reason why the 09 template was so similar to the 08 template was actually my lack of originality. And I didn't bully - I asked nicely - several times. Nominally Humane! some time Monday, 21:10, Jan 17 2011 UTC
- OK then, Lyrithya - can you sort out the sizes so they'll be, more or less, like the previous years? Otherwise we'll do your original one. 2010 is going pink! Also, how are you doing POTR? ~ 21:23, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Which one would be the original? Sizes of what? Huh? ~ 21:33, 17 January 2011
- User:Lyrithya/Nothing/top pink. But I think the current template already looks like it, more or less? ~ 21:39, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
- I can make it look less similar. Yes, yesss... it is all becoming clear, what I must do... ~ 22:33, 17 January 2011
- User:Lyrithya/Nothing/top pink. But I think the current template already looks like it, more or less? ~ 21:39, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Which one would be the original? Sizes of what? Huh? ~ 21:33, 17 January 2011
- OK then, Lyrithya - can you sort out the sizes so they'll be, more or less, like the previous years? Otherwise we'll do your original one. 2010 is going pink! Also, how are you doing POTR? ~ 21:23, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
Oh, fiddle; I completely forgot about this... and I had such plans and everything to mutilate the poor template... damn. ~ 06:07, 6 February 2011