Talk:Xenu
Speaking as an actual expert in the field, I really don't see how to possibly write an article funnier than the Wikipedia one. - David Gerard 07:02, 13 Apr 2005 (EDT)
- Actually, something has just occurred to me. See Fountainhead Earth. I'm also going to delete the big chunk that's taken STRAIGHT from the Wikipedia article - not because it's not funny (I wrote it and agree it's eminently ridiculous), but because it's actually what they believe - David Gerard 11:18, 27 May 2005 (EDT)
- Done --Geekybroad 21:09, 21 Dec 2005 (UTC)
Wikipedia articles don't really fit in here... though it is hilarious, I'll give you that ;) I've reverted to the original, and redirected here from Xenu (alt), with the Wikipedia link at the top. --LuminaryJanitor 14:16, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
If I were given both articles without the URLs or logos, I would never be able to distinguish between the Wikipedia one and the Uncyclopedia one.--UtarEmpire 15:52, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
After reading up on Scientology and it's beliefs, I am positive that a drunken Uncyclopedian was the true founder of Scientology. Because it's that poorly written and thought out. Also, isn't it kind of sad when the Wiki article is far funnier then we could ever come up with?--4.246.138.70 10:32, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- I have to join the chorus here - you really can't beat the original. This is the amateurs versus the pros, people. And editing these articles here I keep getting scared that I vandalized the Wikipedia page by accident! 70.15.116.59 17:55, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
The Frickin' Truth[edit source]
Just a passing thought... the "The Frickin' Truth" section is soberingly unfunny. --69.144.64.78 20:44, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Post the actual wikipedia article, that would be epic.
Where ...[edit source]
... did the old contents of the talk page go? :-0 SillyGuy 07:23, 27 July 2007 (UTC)