Talk:The Really Really Gay Album
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
From Pee Review[edit source]
Anything? That's it? No more reviews? 159.148.202.14 11:40, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
| Humour: | 4 | The humor just isn't there for me. I re-read it looking for a specific instance of a well-defined, understandable joke and could not really find one. |
| Concept: | 4 | Why is this necessary? I don't know. Is it a slam on the band Gay against you? Is it a parody of Prince's Purple Rain or Pet Shop Boys' Battleship Potempkin? I don't know. Where's the rationale...under the sofa cushion, along with the remote control? I don't know. |
| Prose and formatting: | 2 | The spelling and punctuation need work. The sentences need work too. "They also say, that the then US president Oscar Wilde was the reason, why October, November and December were conjoined, and he was also the author of idea of releasing it on this date." Get rid of those illogical commas. |
| Images: | 4 | Not much to see other than a pink Oscar. |
| Miscellaneous: | 2 | I'm sorry, but my personal reaction was negative. Maybe I just don't get the joke, but even if there is some deep significance to a "Really Really Gay Album" the writing and development of the article fail to strike any sparks for me. |
| Final Score: | 16 | |
| Reviewer: | ----OEJ 20:41, 30 January 2007 (UTC) | |
From Pee Review 2[edit source]
| Humour: | 3 | A little too random and homophobic for me. |
| Concept: | 2.5 | Not good, I have to say. Maybe you should lay off gays. (I am NOT one myself, but I believe they have a right.) |
| Prose and formatting: | 5 | Average. I fixed up some errors. |
| Images: | 7 | Nice albums. Work has been put into them, I see. |
| Miscellaneous: | 3 | Doesn't appeal to me. |
| Final Score: | 20.5 | I'm sorry, just not what I think is appropriate for Uncyclopedia. |
| Reviewer: | Ikabu 05:46, 11 March 2007 (UTC) | |
From Pee Review 3[edit source]
| Humour: | 2 | As per the previous reviews, it's a bunch of homophobic jibes, random stuff ("ocnodecember 69", how amusing) and suchlike. Nothing approaching an original joke here, I'm afraid |
| Concept: | 1 | I really don't see the point of this article |
| Prose and formatting: | 5 | Some mistakes here and there, nothing horrendous, but some bits still need fixing |
| Images: | 6 | Well, it has some, and work has gone into them. Fine enough I suppose |
| Miscellaneous: | 2 | Sorry, but this is not a good article. And please don't put it back up for review again without a lot of changes, 3 reviews all saying similar things ought to suggest something |
| Final Score: | 16 | Honestly, I don't see the point of this article, but if you really think it's something Uncyc desperately needs, then get out your tin of elbow grease and put some serious work in. Ask good writers for help if you think you have ideas but can't get the best out of them, and remember to look through HTBFANJS - it often throws up a good idea even if you've read it before. |
| Reviewer: | --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 13:21, 14 September 2007 (UTC) | |