Talk:Sweatshop

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Bmup smaller.jpg The Proofreading Service has proofreaded your article. Like it? Need more proofreading? Click here!


DerHindemith 03:54, 4 October 2007 (UTC) By the way, I've proofread a considerable amount of detritus on uncyclopedia, and may I say that not only was this portion of uncyclopedia stunningly well-written, but it was mostly free of grammatical errors. It was as if the writer actually looked over what he had written before posting it. I wait with bated breath the children's section and its flawless grammar and syntax.

Thanks for looking over the article. I hate to disappoint, but there isn't going to be a children's section. The "under construction" thing was intended as my way of showing that the site was made using sweatshop labour. Also, notice that it's a "children" section, not "childswear". I'm aware that that joke is too subtle for my own good, but I didn't want to actually write that subpage. I might have to expand on the joke. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  16:01, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

Cake, Is it a lie?[edit]

Would it be too fad/même based to insert a foot note noting that the cake is a lie? Hmmm...no article on the game Portal to link to anyway, yet... – Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.157.52.195 (talk • contribs)

I have no idea what you're talking about, which would make me feel that you should leave it be. As a general rule, it's best to avoid memes. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  11:50, 23 October 2007 (UTC)
WOW. That was like the perfect article, subtle, satirical and proving a point. I could only ever dream of writing one that good in some strange dream where I am not thinking about naked wome- yeah. Sir DJ ~ Irreverent OZ! Noobaward.jpg Wotm.jpg Unbooks mousepad.PNG GUN.png

Epicness[edit]

Damn, epic sweatshop article. Very well written.

Thanks. In case you didn't already notice, you can click the links on the right and explore the menswear, ladieswear sections etc. A few people have missed those in the past. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  17:35, January 5, 2011 (UTC)