Talk:RMS Olympic

As much as I appreciate fact in an article, it's not as important as having humour. This is, so far, not very funny, but appears to be factual. Can that be remedied? Nominally Humane! 10:22 06 Apr

The only potential I can see is that despite the great efforts of the RMS Olympic crew , it failed to sink. The ship collided with a British warship Hawke (Damaged, repaired but sunk in WW1 shortly after), witnessed the sinking of the British Dreadnought Audacious by a mine in 1914. This was considered so shocking that the British government confirm the loss of the Audacious - - despite photos taken from the Olympic - for the entire war. Sank a U-Boat and Finally, in 1934 the Olympic rammed another ship which sank and saw deaths. It was finally scrapped in 1935 in case it endangered anymore ships. That's my suggestion to 'twist' this enough to make it more interesting. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:34, April 6, 2012 (UTC)

OK I have 're-nosed' the article. I may work on it more and incorporate the work done so far which supplies the factual framework. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:56, April 6, 2012 (UTC)

Complete rewrite. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:07, April 7, 2012 (UTC)

Featured with a vandal reference to Sheena Easton. Kept it and it was embraced in the final edit. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 20:20, April 27, 2012 (UTC)