Talk:Optical illusion
If anyone has the ability to make some better pictures for this, that'd be good. I only had MSpaint on the computer i wrote this on! • Spang • ☃ • talk •
--Usewho'sname? 12:52, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
ok it might not fit the joke of the article but it IS a damn fine picture!--Usewho'sname? 12:55, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
It totally doesn't fit with the artilcle! I made a point of not putting the "girl you can't see anything behind because she's so hot" joke in as it's been done far too many times befroe. But it is nice to look at. ;) • Spang • ☃ • talk • 00:56, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
Talk not about pic with hot nearly naked girl in it[edit source]
I think there should be an Optical Allusion page, you know, something about how to allude to eyes or something. John1728 07:55, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
And btw, I redirected "Optical Illusion" to this page (note the uppercase "I"), but if anyone wants to swap the two titles, feel free. John1728 07:59, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
From Pee Review[edit source]
If you look at it, you should get the gist of it - basically blatant lies about pictures right next to them. I think it needs a little more cowbell, along with some more/better examples. And better pictures perhaps (I only had MSpaint on the computer i wrote it on). I also couldn't decide whether it should be under Optical_illusion or ...illusions. Wikipee's is under illusion, so i went with that for now, but i don't think it looks right when linking to it. --Spang 00:40, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
- I haven't looked at it yet, but normally the plural nazis have you put the article at the singular form of the word, and have the plural redirect to it. The title that shows at the top of the page can be changed with {{title-left|Optical illusions}} (or whatever you want it to say). Having said that, I'll go read it. :] --KATIE!! 01:51, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
- Well done! I've changed the title to Optical illusions, and added a category. I can't think of anything for an image, but I hear my images are in poor taste anyways, :]. It looks quite nice. --KATIE!! 01:58, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks! Poor taste images may be better then the rather bad MSPaint ones on there now! I think it probably fine the way it is, and if I think up more things to put in or do the pictures better it'll just be a bonus. --Spang 22:52, 22 March 2006 (UTC)
A new picture[edit source]
An optical illusion. The two circles seem to move but it doesn't actually.--SunnyChow 16:27, 17 November 2008 (UTC)