Talk:Numpad7

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to Numpad7. This is also a forum for spreading libelous rumors about the article's subject. This is not a forum for general discussion about what you did last night. We have the Village Dump for things like that.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Uncyclopedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be Civil Assume Bad Faith Don't Be A Dick No Cyberbullying	Article policies How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid Satirical point of view Verifiability vs. Complete Bollocks

From Pee Review

When I saw this bad boy was empty I jumped at it! Rewriting the history of WWII from memory (American memory at that) and changing a few names to protect the Dutch, and I was off. And now, the article is off. Give it your best shot - thanks! --Smrt-guy 01:50, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Humour:	3	Relies far too heavily on the concept, which is not nearly funny enough to carry through a lot of boring prose
Concept:	7	It is quite an amusing idea, but not used well enough
Prose and formatting:	5	OK, but needs broken up. Images will do that.
Images:	2	You only have one. You need more.
Miscellaneous:	8	Definitely miscellaneous
Final Score:	25	The main problem is that most of the text of this article simply describes a war with keys inserted in place of armies. The odd joke such as losing ctrl and the days of dos are on the right lines although they're not particularly hilarious. As for the WWII thing- it doesn't work that well. The online gaming style pages describing wars manage to keep the humour of the concept going througout but because this is written in a straight forward narrative style it needs more effort put into specific jokes. Has enough potential that I've bothered to go and take out the red links for you anyway.
Reviewer:	--Kelpan 20:07, 16 April 2007 (UTC)