Talk:Misinformation

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to Misinformation. This is also a forum for spreading libelous rumors about the article's subject. This is not a forum for general discussion about what you did last night. We have the Village Dump for things like that.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Uncyclopedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers.	Be Civil Assume Bad Faith Don't Be A Dick No Cyberbullying	Article policies How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid Satirical point of view Verifiability vs. Complete Bollocks

Thanks to everyone who helped/contributed to this article. I thought it was going to die. *Sniff* An Ape that Only Exists on Thursdays 21:33, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Yay! I make happy! Now, should I put up the OMG template to replace the undeniable fact thing? --The fatgoat 02:39, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

funny!--WELCOME TO UNCYCLOPEDIA HELL!!!! 11:55, July 13, 2012 (UTC)

From Pee Review

Humour:	7	It took me a minute, but I finally got it. Each section has some funny in it, which is a good thing (I often screw up in this area).
Concept:	9	I never would have thought of it; misinformation is a type of banana.
Prose and formatting:	6	Good enough, but sometimes one has to stare at it for a moment to get the joke. People who are easily distracted by the picture of the misinformation may not read the article at all.
Images:	10	That just cracked me up. The pictures are the real gold of the article.
Miscellaneous:	8	There's something missing, but I'm not sure what. Maybe work on the prose a bit. Make it longer, and get rid of that "indisputable accuracy" template at the top.
Final Score:	40	I like it. With a bit more work and maybe a tiny bit of inspiration, it could be VFH-able.
Reviewer:	The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 20:59, 22 March 2007 (UTC)