Talk:Mad (magazine)

From Pee Review

This is an article that i have been working on for two days, and i think it's pretty decent, since i still can be considered a NOOB, i need some advice as far as what i can do for this article...And should i delete the Mark Fredrickson part? MAD magazine

Humour:	3	I can't really see any humour there, sorry. It seems you just throw words and celebrity names onto it. The thing I like is the Russian reversal's quotes, they are pretty funny.
Concept:	4	Correct me if I'm wrong, but I have never seen any magazine that quite similar to this one. If you really made this magazine up, then it's pretty hard to satirise (to make satire, lol). You need to explain what magazine is it, in quite details. Porn? Nerds?
Prose and formatting:	5	At first it was cool, very tidy and the images are placed well. But after the comic stuff, the images are all over the place, which is quite messy. Maybe something should be done there. Also put some introduction.
Images:	6	Heaps of pictures is good, but it's better if you have cool pictures. These images are not-that good, so probably 6 is the best I can give. The comic is pretty funny, actually
Miscellaneous:	4	It's just doesn't look that nice, which probably make the reader skip the article. Tidy up a bit, put some good humour and don't forget the category.
Final Score:	22	Not a very good concept, which probably makes it lack of humour. Also remember don't just throw away names. And watch out for Michael Moore.
Reviewer:	It's gneomI 14:51, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

I think you don't have to get rid of that part, just make it funnier. If else fails, then whack it. Good luck - It's gneomI 14:52, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

• By the way...i didnt make this magazine up at all. Its a REAL magazine, and I found it on the most wanted article page. I just made fun of all real things, even the MAD look at.--Arborguitars 17:11, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, dude, if you haven't ever heard of MAD Magazine, that's pretty sad. It's one of the biggest humor magazines out there, right next to National Lampoon. Get somebody who actually read the magazine to review this, but they're right about one thing: it does need a major overhaul. For the Sergio thing, get rid of the last one. It doesn't fit in with the first two, and it was obviously an original sketch. But you DID do a pretty good job replicating his style. Just make the 2nd one clearer and put in a different third one. --Señor Flipwits >>>Vocalize!<<< ~~Make Good Job of Reading~~ 02:50, 29 August 2007 (UTC)