Talk:Leeds

From Pee Review

I've done a proposed update here but now I've typed it, I'm not sure it's funny... – Preceding unsigned comment added by Markfiend (talk • contribs)

Seeming as the "update" is apparently just an expansion, then you should copy the text of your version over the main one. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 18:04, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. Done. I'm still getting my head round the wiki thing; I don't actually need permission, right? oops forgot to sign again. --Markfiend 12:57, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

Not unless it's a very different change, for example replacing the God article with entirely different text. NRVs, Expands, Fixes, Pitys and Rewrites do not usually need permission to change in any way providing it is beneficial. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 14:49, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

---

Seems to me if you want to expand the ardickle you should include History of Leeds, Famous Cesspits of Leeds, Why Leeds is called Leeds and not West Piggymorton, Great Industries of Leeds, Traditional Hamster-Blinding Festivals of Leeds, and so forth. As it stands we have sport, pop music, and tourism sections and that's all...not exactly the portrait of a city even by the standards of that offal parody rag Wikipedia. ----OEJ 11:59, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Food for thought. Thanks. ----Markfiend 13:52, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

This is crap

I'm going to come back to this and delete some of the bull - due respect, but crap football (that's soccer to most of you) references aren't funny, at all, to anyone over the age of 11. --Gladstone 15:55, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

In fact, it's not just the football references that are crap, it's the whole bloody lot.

--Gladstone 16:00, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Screw you, hippy.

Pretty Accurate

yea yea